E-ISSN 2577-2058
 

Case Report
Online Published: 21 Jul 2023


Xavier, Schammel, Schammel, Trocha, Farnsworth, Devane: DOTATATE: Positive is not always NET

ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are increasing in incidence, and the use of 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/computed tomography (CT) to specifically identify NET has aided with early diagnosis, with 83%–100% sensitivity.

Case:

Here, we present a case in which a suspected small bowel obstruction by CT was 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/CT avid in both the mass and adjacent nodes, suggestive of NET. However, the mass was not consistent with NET during surgical resection and the intra-operative frozen section revealed heterotopic pancreatic tissue and necrotic fat. Surgical resection would have been extensive and morbid; given the lack of a malignant diagnosis, it was aborted.

Discussion:

A comprehensive literature review demonstrated few false positive lesions identified by 68Ga-DOTOTATE; most frequently lymph nodes, pancreas, and prostate. Our case is the only reported false positive in a necrotic lesion. These cases highlight the importance of evaluating 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/CT imaging for NET in the global context and presentation of the patient.

Introduction

Neuroendocrine tumors’ (NETs) incidence of 35/100,000 cases is increasing [1] with tumors noted in all anatomic sites, particularly the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, rectum, and pancreas [2]. Surgical resection can be curative with a corresponding increase in survival [3] due to earlier detection of disease.
Octreotide, a synthetic peptide somatostatin analog, utilizing Indium-111 radiolabeling [4], has a high affinity to somatostatin receptors SSTR2 and SSTR5, low affinity for SSTR3, and minimal affinity for the SSTR1 or SSTR4 subtypes [5]. A limitation of utilizing octreotide for imaging has been its affinity for SSTR2 and SSTR5, but not the other subtypes. In comparison, Gallium-68 DOTATATE (68Ga-DOTOTATE) has a much higher affinity to SSTR2 (10×) and an affinity to SSTR4 and SSTR5 [6], with superior sensitivity, allowing for better detection of smaller NETs and those that express fewer SSTR2 receptor subtypes.
Previously reported studies demonstrated 68Ga-DOTOTATE exhibited a sensitivity of 80%–100% for primary or metastatic lesions [1] and 82%–90% specificity when compared to pathology as the diagnostic gold standard [1]. The Food and Drug Association approved the use of 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/computed tomography (CT) in 2016. 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/CT showed a 100% sensitivity in the neck and thoracic regions, with the lowest sensitivity in the liver and pancreas regions (83.3%) [7]. This sensitivity is notably higher than Octreotide’s 25% sensitivity for the neck and thoracic regions and 83.3% in the pancreatic region. Octreotide was also only positive in 50% of abdominal lymph nodes. 68Ga-DOTOTATE had an overall 90% specificity, with other studies reporting specificity as high as 100% when compared to CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging [810]. The use of 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/CT has changed management in 20% and 24% of patients referred for re-evaluation or re-staging from previous CT/MRI or Octreotide imaging, respectively [7]. This is primarily due to the increased physiological uptake from the approximate 10-fold increased affinity 68Ga-DOTOTATE has with the SSTR2 receptor leading to higher and more detailed image quality, especially for the smaller lesions [7].
This report presents and discusses a patient who underwent 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/CT imaging with avidity for a small bowel mesenteric lesion suggesting a NET regional lymph node disease. The surgical evaluation demonstrated a finding inconsistent with NET, as confirmed by histological analysis. Given the reported high specificity and sensitivity of 68Ga-DOTOTATE, we report inconsistency in avidity for a necrotic and non-NET lesion and present a comprehensive literature review evaluating other false positives.

Case Report

This report has been approved by the institutional review board and the need for written informed consent was waived. A 68-year-old male was referred to surgical oncology for a second opinion concerning a mass in the proximal small bowel mesentery. The patient had presented a month earlier to his primary care physician with symptoms of small bowel obstruction and was admitted to an outside facility for evaluation. Intravenous and oral contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis was obtained. CT findings included a normal hepatic morphology without intrahepatic biliary dilation or mass. A mesenteric mass was noted in the proximal small bowel measuring 5 × 3.1 cm (Fig. 1a and b); mildly dilatated contrast-filled loops of the small bowel were noted with a gradual transition into normal caliber distal loops, suggesting an ileus versus partial obstruction.
The differential diagnosis included metastatic adenopathy, nodal NET disease, or lymphoma. Biopsy via laparoscopy was recommended, at which point the patient sought a second opinion.
A review of the outside films noted the incidental abdominal mass. Due to proximity to the root of the mesentery and the entire small bowel vasculature, laparoscopic resection would be difficult. The solid nature in the mesentery suggested a neuroendocrine tumor with regional nodal disease. The patient underwent a 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/CT. Heterogeneous tracer accumulation within the mesenteric mass was noted (Fig. 1c and d), suggestive of somatostatin avidity. A couple of small tracer avid lymph nodes were present immediately cephalad to the mass. There was also intense uptake within an enlarged mesenteric lymph node or nodal cluster within the more proximal mesentery. No distant disease was noted.
Figure 1.
Ga-68 DOTATATE Imaging. Axial (a) and coronal (b) intravenous and oral contrast enhanced CT of the abdomen demonstrates a central mesenteric mass (white arrow). (c) 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET-CT shows uptake within the mesenteric mass (white arrow). (d) 68Ga-DOTOTATE axial MIP demonstrating heterogeneous uptake and small focus of avidity (black arrow) greater than background and bowel.
Figure 2.
Histology. Fat necrosis (white arrow) surrounded by fibrosis and inflammation (black arrow; 100×).
Table 1.
Comprehensive literature review.*
Author Year Age Sex Location Symptoms/Hx Imaging Resection Details/findings Diagnosis
Demirci 2014 65 F Axillary, paraaortocavaland bilateral inguinal LN Hx of pancreatic NETs Increased uptake in LN as well as vertebrae and iliac bone Excisional LN biopsy from axillary region; Low grade follicular lymphoma, hemangiomas
Lancellotti 2019 69 M Tail of pancreas Sigmoid adenocarcinoma; colectomy and adjuvant chemo MRI: 1.5 cm nodule pancreatic tail; EUS 1.5 cm anechoic nodule pancreatic tail; MRI/CT 2cm 8mo later; 68Ga-DOTOTATE focal uptake distal spleno-pancreatectomy Intrapancreatic accessory spleen (IPAS).
Schmidt 2019 60 M Prostate Hx metastatic NET; small bowel obstruction; elevated PSA Uptake in prostate, liver, mesentery, peripancreatic LN US guided bx Prostate bx negative for malignancy Prostate:inflammation; liver, mesentery, peripanacreatic LN NET
Yilmaz 2019 66 M Prostate Hx of midgut NET, elevated PSA 68Ga-DOTOTATE uptake in prostate gland Core bx of prostate Chronic prostatitis
Chalmers 2020 69 M Small bowel carcinoid; lymphadenopathy Hx small bowel NET; octeotride;tx 68Ga-DOTOTATE uptake in mediastinal/hilar LN Bronchoscopy with FNA LN Symptoms of new positive 68Ga-DOTOTATE improved after being treated with itraconazole Non-necrotic granulomas; bronchial washing cryptococcus neoforman
Lakhotia 2020 78 F Pancreatic head Yr long hx diarrhea; elevated VIP CT; pancreatic uncinate lesion with 68Ga-DOTOTATE uptake EUS with FNA Presumed vipoma; symptoms resolved Normal pancreatic tissue
Zampetti 2020 75 F Interaortocaval Hx kidney tumor; abn metanephrine level 68Ga-DOTOTATE uptake abd/iliac crest Suspected pheochromocytoma; abdominal resection;bone lesion bx:metastatic renal tumor Resection of abdominal tumor Interaortocaval PGL
Filizoglu 2021 47 M Petrous apex stomach Presumed stomach NET 68Ga-DOTOTATE uptake in petrous apex Cholesterol granuloma of temporal bone
Alruwaili 2021 52 M Palpitations, tachycardia, hot flashes, chest tightness 68Ga-DOTOTATE avidity in thoracic and lumbar spine MRI: atypical hemangioma; serum chromogranin A testing negative. Hemangioma
Deng 2021 67 F Thyroid gland and cervical lymph nodes, bladder Hx of thyroid cancer 68Ga-DOTOTATE uptake in thyroid gland, cervical LN, and bladder 68Ga-DOTOTATE uptake disappeared after urination Bladder diverticulum
Civan 2021 50 M Cervical lesion in internal jugular chain Suspicion of glomus jugular paraganglioma 68Ga-DOTOTATE uptake from increased SSTR expression internal jugular chain Bx of cervical LN Met of squamous cell carcinoma
Xavier 2021 68 M Small bowel mesentery Symptoms of small bowel obstruction Mass on abdominal CT in proximal small bowel mesentery, 68Ga-DOTOTATE uptake in mesenteric mass Surgical resection Inflammatory component upon evaluation of frozen section Pancreatic fat necrosis
*Limited to complete reports, English only and those which the institution could obtain.
Full reports unavailable.
An open surgical resection was performed; during the procedure, the mesenteric mass was consistent with scarring rather than nodal tissue and inconsistent with a NET presentation, especially in light of no primary small bowel lesion noted. The small bowel was run from the ligament of Treitz to the ileocecal valve. No palpable lesions were noted, again, inconsistent with a NET presentation. An incisional biopsy of the nodular/scarred area in the mesentery was completed and sent for intraoperative diagnosis, which suggested an inflammatory component, including sclerosing mesenteritis and no evidence of NET disease. The operation was completed without incident or postoperative complications, and the patient was discharged on hospital day 3.
Final pathology revealed heterotopic necrotic pancreatic tissue (Fig. 2); IgG4-related inflammatory disease was negative. No further treatment was warranted; follow-up was scheduled for 6 months.

Discussion

Identification and staging of NETs are essential for appropriate therapy and optimal patient care. Staging is based on proliferation rate and regional/metastatic disease, which is optimized by imaging NETs that capitalizes on the sensitivity to the high SSTR2 expression [7] that is identified by 68Ga-DOTOTATE that hence, allows for differentiation from other cancerous processes. [11]. Additionally, the high SSTR2 expression of NETs has also been a target for specific therapy as the SSTRs have anti-secretory and apoptotic or anti-proliferative activity when bound with somatostatin analogs.
As NET expression of SSTR2 is high, 68Ga-DOTOTATE identification of these lesions has typically been specific; however, false-positive cases have been reported (Table 1). Overall, pancreatic tissue has had the highest incidence of false positives; pancreatic tissue is characterized by higher expression of SSTR2 in both cancerous and non-cancerous tissue [12]. Only one other report was noted in the small bowel mesentery (Table 1). Other intraoperative pathologic findings in the 68Ga-DOTOTATE false positive reports included non-necrotic granulomas, paraganglioma, inflammation, squamous cell carcinoma, a diverticulum, and hemangiomas.
To identify patterns in false-positive 68Ga-DOTOTATE uptake, we present a comprehensive literature review. Of the 11 patients reported, 7 were aged 65 or older, and 7 were male. The location of positivity was throughout the body: pancreas, prostate, small bowel, stomach, and bladder. Interestingly, four patients had a history of NET or a current diagnosis and demonstrated a false positive 68Ga-DOTOTATE uptake. In presenting our case and reviewing the literature, it is evident that 68Ga-DOTOTATE sensitivity and specificity are impressive; however, not 100%. Subjectively evaluating each patient based on criteria such as age, past medical history, and comorbidities should always be the cornerstone in correlating the imaging results with a possible NET diagnosis. In general, a less invasive approach to confirm the diagnosis before formal treatment, such as surgical resection, is advised.

Conclusion

The primary consideration in the management of patients with NETs is to define resectability. In this regard, imaging is critical in defining the extent of disease and what surgical approach may be considered or if the patient is unresectable. Our comprehensive review of the literature highlights the importance of confirming a diagnosis of NET prior to any major surgical resection. Percutaneous biopsies are ideal however, in the abdomen, this can be difficult. Therefore, if a solitary site of avidity is noted, this may require an intraoperative biopsy with a frozen section to confirm or refute the diagnosis: as was done in our case report.

References

1. Mojtahedi A, Thamake S, Tworowska I, Ranganathan D, Delpassand ES. The value of (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors compared to current FDA approved imaging modalities: a review of literature. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014; 4:426–34.
2. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, Zhao B, Zhou S, Xu Y, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3:1335–42; doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589.
3. Shell J, Keutgen XM, Millo C, Nilubol N, Patel D, Sadowski S, et al. 68-Gallium DOTATATE scanning in symptomatic patients with negative anatomic imaging but suspected neuroendocrine tumor. Int J Endocr Oncol 2018; 5:IJE04; doi: 10.2217/ije-2017-0005.
4. Costa F, Gumz B. Octreotide - a review of its ise in treating neuroendocrine tumours. Eur Endocrinol 2014; 10:70–4; doi: 10.17925/EE.2014.10.01.70.
5. Hofland LJ, Lamberts SW. Somatostatin receptors and disease: role of receptor subtypes. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996; 10:163–76; doi: 10.1016/s0950-351x(96)80362-4.
6. Pauwels E, Cleeren F, Bormans G, Deroose CM. Somatostatin receptor PET ligands - the next generation for clinical practice. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 8:311–31.
7. Fallahi B, Manafi-Farid R, Eftekhari M, Fard-Esfahani A, Emami-Ardekani A, Geramifar P, et al. Diagnostic fficiency of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT as ompared to 99mTc-Octreotide SPECT/CT andonventional orphologic odalities in euroendocrine umors. Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol 2019; 7:129–40; doi: 10.22038/AOJNMB.2019.39392.1263.
8. Haug AR, Cindea-Drimus R, Auernhammer CJ, Reincke M, Beuschlein F, Wängler B, et al. Neuroendocrine tumor recurrence: diagnosis with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Radiology 2014; 270:517–25; doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122501.
9. Hofman MS, Kong G, Neels OC, Eu P, Hong E, Hicks RJ. High management impact of Ga-68 DOTATATE (GaTate) PET/CT for imaging neuroendocrine and other somatostatin expressing tumours. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2012; 56:40–7; doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02327.x.
10. Srirajaskanthan R, Kayani I, Quigley AM, Soh J, Caplin ME, Bomanji J. The role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET in patients with neuroendocrine tumors and negative or equivocal findings on 111In-DTPA-octreotide scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 2010; 51:875–2; doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.066134. E
11. Klomp MJ, Dalm SU, de Jong M, Feelders RA, Hofland J, Hofland LJ. Epigenetic regulation of somatostatin and somatostatin receptors in neuroendocrine tumors and other types of cancer. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2021; 22:495–510; doi: 10.1007/s11154-020-09607-z.
12. Shahbaz M, Ruliang F, Xu Z, Benjia L, Cong W, Zhaobin H, et al. mRNA expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes SSTR-2, SSTR-3, and SSTR-5 and its significance in pancreatic cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13:46; doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0467-z.


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Xavier BJ, Schammel CM, Schammel DP, Trocha SD, Farnsworth E, Devane AM, . DOTOTATE: Positive is not always NET. A J Diagn Imaging. 2023; 9(4): 47-51. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20230314010926


Web Style

Xavier BJ, Schammel CM, Schammel DP, Trocha SD, Farnsworth E, Devane AM, . DOTOTATE: Positive is not always NET. https://www.wisdomgale.com/ajdi/?mno=146350 [Access: December 30, 2024]. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20230314010926


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Xavier BJ, Schammel CM, Schammel DP, Trocha SD, Farnsworth E, Devane AM, . DOTOTATE: Positive is not always NET. A J Diagn Imaging. 2023; 9(4): 47-51. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20230314010926



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Xavier BJ, Schammel CM, Schammel DP, Trocha SD, Farnsworth E, Devane AM, . DOTOTATE: Positive is not always NET. A J Diagn Imaging. (2023), [cited December 30, 2024]; 9(4): 47-51. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20230314010926



Harvard Style

Xavier, B. J., Schammel, C. M., Schammel, D. P., Trocha, S. D., Farnsworth, E., Devane, A. M. & (2023) DOTOTATE: Positive is not always NET. A J Diagn Imaging, 9 (4), 47-51. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20230314010926



Turabian Style

Xavier, Brandon J, Christine Marie-Gilligan Schammel, David P Schammel, Steven D Trocha, Eric Farnsworth, Aron Michael Devane, and . 2023. DOTOTATE: Positive is not always NET. American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging , 9 (4), 47-51. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20230314010926



Chicago Style

Xavier, Brandon J, Christine Marie-Gilligan Schammel, David P Schammel, Steven D Trocha, Eric Farnsworth, Aron Michael Devane, and . "DOTOTATE: Positive is not always NET." American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging 9 (2023), 47-51. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20230314010926



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Xavier, Brandon J, Christine Marie-Gilligan Schammel, David P Schammel, Steven D Trocha, Eric Farnsworth, Aron Michael Devane, and . "DOTOTATE: Positive is not always NET." American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging 9.4 (2023), 47-51. Print. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20230314010926



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Xavier, B. J., Schammel, C. M., Schammel, D. P., Trocha, S. D., Farnsworth, E., Devane, A. M. & (2023) DOTOTATE: Positive is not always NET. American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging , 9 (4), 47-51. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20230314010926