Diop, Diano O., Jarikre, Theophilus A., Oni, Oluwole O., Nwufoh, Onyeka C., Adediran, Oyeduntan A.: Haemogram and blood cell morphological changes in haemoparasitic infection of poultry birds
ABSTRACT
Aim and Background:
The poultry industry faces myriads challenges, necessitating effective management and control strategies. Thus, this study was designed to identify haemoparasite and determine the impact of haemoparasitic infection on blood cells and serum biochemical profiles in some poultry birds in Ibadan, Nigeria.
Methods:
The study examined 390 birds of different types for the prevalence and type of haemoparasites, haematological parameters, and associated risk factors. Thin smears were prepared from each bird and examined microscopically. Erythrocyte morphology, including size variation (anisocytosis), shape abnormalities (poikilocytosis), and other abnormalities were evaluated in the monolayer region of the smear.
Results:
The study found that 44.6% were infected with haemoparasites. Five species of haemoparasites were found during this study, including Plasmodium, Haemoparoteus, Leucocytozoon, Babesia, and Microfilaria. In single infection Plasmodium spp was the most prevalent haemoparasite (51.72%) followed by Haemoproteus spp 3.45%, Babesia 3.45% and Microfilaria 1.72%. In mixed infection Plasmodium and Haemoproteus (19 %), Plasmodium and Microfilaria (8.62%), Babesia and Plasmodium (6.90%), Babesia and Haemoproteus (1.72%), Plasmodium and Leukocytozoon 1.72%, in triple infection Babesia, Haemoproteus, and Plasmodium (1.72%). Infected birds showed significantly lower haematological parameters, with globulin and creatinine being crucial, while albumin was lower, and the difference between red blood cell diameters was not significant.
Conclusion:
The study reveals that haematological parameters and biochemical profiles in poultry birds are crucial indicators of their health and offer practical insights for poultry health management.
KEYWORDS Avian; haemoparasites; haematology; biochemistry; morphology
Introduction
The production of poultry in Nigeria currently exceeds 200 million birds [ 1]. It produced 179,667 metric tons of meat and 434,000 metric tons of eggs averagely annually, yet the output hardly meets the growing demand [ 2]. Changes in the environment and the growing human population increase the chances of poultry coming into contact with wild birds, which may facilitate disease transmission among avian species [ 3]. The susceptibility of birds to haemoparasite infection can be bolstered by several predisposing factors, such as their age, host immunity, reproductive state, seasons, and temperature [ 4].
Haemosporidians are one of the most widely studied groups of vertebrate parasites because members of the genus Plasmodium have severe impacts on human health [ 5]. Microfilariae of nematodes of the superfamily Filarioidea have also been reported in the peripheral blood (circulating microfilariae) of birds belonging to many orders [ 6]. Various haematophagous arthropods comprising mosquitoes (Culicidae), biting midges (Ceratopogonidae), Louse Flies (Hippoboscidae), and Black Flies (Simuliidae) are regarded as the main vectors of avian blood parasites [ 7]. Differential exposure to vectors and host susceptibility to a certain parasite are two interrelated factors that may alter the likelihood of infection in different hosts and sexes [ 8]. For instance, characteristics unique to males and females, such as eating patterns, habitat utilization, or parental involvement, might either increase or decrease the likelihood that a host will be exposed to a particular parasite. Additionally, certain birds may be more vulnerable to a particular parasite infection due to stress and hormonal variations between the sexes. Some avian species’ elevated testosterone levels during the breeding season have been linked to a decreased immune response to specific parasites. Therefore, during the breeding season, birds may become more vulnerable to infection, resulting in a trade-off between reproduction and immune defence [ 8].
Blood parasites are exceedingly prevalent. Some of them, including Trypanosoma species and microfilariae of filariid nematodes, appear in blood plasma, while others are intracellular. The phylum Apicomplexa contains a variety of taxa that include highly diverse intracellular parasites, including the orders Haemosporida, Piroplasmida, and Eucoccidiorida, which includes the two suborders Adeleorina (Hepatozoon and Hemogregarina) and Eimeriorina [ 9]. Nematodes belonging to the superfamily Microfilaria of various orders have circulated microfilariae, or filarioids, in their peripheral blood. Bird filarioids are distributed around the world and are members of the family Onchocercidae, which includes the subfamilies Dirofilariinae, Onchocercinae, Splendidofilariinae, and Lemdaniinae [ 6]. Undoubtedly, a variety of factors, including the temperature, the local vector, and the avian population, contribute to variations in haemosporidian prevalence and diversity. However, the prior study also hints that migratory behavior may be favorably associated with haemosporidian parasite infection status in bird species [ 10]. Thus, this study was designed to identify haemoparasite and determine the impact of haemoparasitic infection on blood cells and serum biochemical profiles in some poultry birds in Ibadan, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods
Study Area
Ibadan, Oyo State is located in the South West Region of Nigeria. Latitude 7 o North and longitude 4 o East bisect the state into four nearly equal parts. The daily average temperature is 26.46°C. The climate is equatorial notably with dry and wet seasons with relatively high humidity [ 11].
Study Population
A total of three hundred and ninety (390) birds comprising layers chickens, broilers chickens, local chickens, turkeys, local ducks, and pigeons were sampled for the purpose of this study, based on their breed, sex, rearing, location, season of sampling, clinical signs, their age, and relative ease of accessibility of transportation.
Study design and Sample Size
Systematic simple random sampling methods were used to select the birds taking into consideration number of samples according to each species across five local government areas in Ibadan, Oyo state.
Where n: is the number of sample size
1.96: is a constant value
Pexp: Previous prevalence=(50%)
D: Level of precision (5%=0.05)
N=384.16 (approximated to 390)
Sample collection
Blood samples were collected by venipuncture and 2ml was withdrawn directly from the wing vein of each selected birds, using sterile syringes and needles of 23 or 25 gauge from the live bird and the blood were transferred into EDTA bottles and plain bottles for hematological and serum biochemical analyses respectively. The samples were placed in a sample container labeled and carried in a flask (cooler) with ice packs and were taken to the Pathology laboratory in the University of Ibadan for analysis.
Haemoparasitological examination
A thin smear of blood was prepared from each bird. The smears were air dried, fixed with absolute (100%) methanol for 2 min, stained with Giemsa solution for 20 min, and diluted in buffer solution at 1hour. Finally, slides were washed gently under running tap water and air dried prior to microscopic assessment. A light microscope was used to search for parasites in the blood smears, then stained blood films blindly. In the event, at least 100,000 erythrocytes (100 fields of microscopic) were examined in each smear, and the number of parasitized cells was observed microscopically at 1000× magnification using immersion oil [ 12]. Erythrocyte morphology, including size variation (anisocytosis), shape abnormalities (poikilocytosis), and abnormalities in haemoglobinization, was evaluated in the monolayer region of the smear. Semiquantitative estimates of polychromasia, anisocytosis, poikilocytosis, and degree of erythrocyte parasitism were also performed.
Haematological and Serum biochemical Analysis
Hemocytometry was used for hematological parameters to measure hemoglobulin concentration, packed cell volume (PCV), red blood cell count (RBC), and total white blood cell (WBC) counts as described by Hong et al., [ 13]. Serum biochemicals, including albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, glucose, protein, and creatinine, were determined by spectrophotometer.
Statistics
All the data were recorded for the birds, types of parasites, and quantification of morphologic changes. Data was subjected to descriptive statistics for prevalence, mean, standard deviation, and inferential statistics using chi-square, t-test, and ANOVA at α=0.05.
Results
A total of 390 birds of different breed, age, sex, and rearing methods, from 5 different locations in Ibadan were examined for the presence of haemoparasites ( Table 1).
Table 1.Distribution of the haemoparasites identified in the examined poultry birds.
Haemoparasites |
No infected |
Prevalence |
p |
Plasmodium |
90 |
51.72% |
0.01 |
Microfilaria |
3 |
1.72% |
|
Babesia |
6 |
3.45% |
|
Haemoproteus |
6 |
3.45% |
|
Plasmodium and Haemoproteus |
33 |
19% |
|
Babesia and Haemoproteus |
3 |
1.72% |
|
Leukocytozoon and Plasmodium |
3 |
1.72% |
|
Microfilaria and plasmodium |
15 |
8.62% |
|
Plasmodium and Babesia |
12 |
6.90% |
|
Plasmodium, Babesia and Haemoproteus |
3 |
1.72% |
|
Out of 390 birds examined, 174 (44.6 %) were infected with one or more blood parasites. Five species of hemoparasites were found during this study, including Plasmodium, Haemoparoteus, Leucocytozoon, Babesia, and Microfilaria. In single infection Plasmodium spp (Plate 1A) was the most prevalent haemoparasite (51.72%) followed by Haemoproteus spp (Plate 1B) 3.45%, Babesia (Plate 1C) 3.45%, and Microfilaria (Plate 1D) 1.72% ( Table 1). In mixed infection Plasmodium and Haemoproteus (19 %), Plasmodium and Microfilaria (8.62%), Babesia and Plasmodium (6.90%), Babesia and Haemoproteus (1.72%), Plasmodium and Leukocytozoon (Plate E) 1.72%, in triple infection Babesia, Haemoproteus and Plasmodium (1.72%).
Plate 1.
Shows A) Plasmodium spp in the rbc (red arrow) of the birds examined, B) Haemoproteus spp (black arrows), C) Babesia spp (yellow arrows), D) Microfilaria (circled), E) Leukocytozoon spp (green arrows) and F) Toxic changes in Neutrophils and Monocytes (blue arrows). Giemsa ×1,000.
Clinical signs observed in affected poultry birds varied such as fever, depression, anorexia, loss of body weight, dyspnea, loss of appetite, emaciation, listlessness, difficulty in breathing, changes in feather appearance, weakness, and lameness in one or both legs. The prevalence based on breed is shown in Table 2, with the highest in layers. Varying incidence was also observed with locations ( Table 3), sex, age, rearing methods, and season ( Table 4).
Table 2.Prevalence of haemoparasite infection in the examined poultry birds.
Breed |
Number sampled |
Number of infected |
Prevalence |
p |
Pigeons |
30 |
18 |
10.34% |
0.02 |
Broiler |
69 |
36 |
20.70% |
|
Layers |
153 |
48 |
27.60% |
|
Local chicken |
60 |
30 |
17.24% |
|
Turkey |
75 |
39 |
22.41% |
|
Duck |
3 |
3 |
1.72% |
|
Table 3.Prevalence of haemoparasite infection according to different locations.
Location |
Number sampled |
Number of infected |
Prevalence |
p |
Farm A |
30 |
18 |
10.34% |
0.04 |
Farm B |
48 |
21 |
12.07% |
|
Farm C |
45 |
18 |
10.34% |
|
Farm D |
9 |
6 |
3.45% |
|
Farm E |
60 |
24 |
13.80% |
|
Farm F |
60 |
12 |
6.90% |
|
Farm G |
138 |
75 |
43.10 % |
|
Table 4.Prevalence of haemoparasites according to sex, age, rearing methods, and season in the examined birds.
Group |
Variables |
Numbers sampled |
Infected |
Prevalence of infected |
p |
Sex |
Male |
126 |
69 |
39.7% |
0.05 |
Female |
264 |
105 |
60.3% |
|
Age |
Young |
189 |
78 |
44.8% |
0.05 |
Adult |
201 |
96 |
55.2% |
|
Rearing Methods |
Floor |
153 |
66 |
38% |
0.03 |
Cage |
237 |
108 |
62% |
|
Seasons |
Rainy |
190 |
94 |
54% |
0.12 |
Dry |
200 |
80 |
46% |
|
The hematologic findings showed that the mean packed cell volume PCV (26.8 ± 1.5), plasma proteins (5.8 ± 1.1), Neutrophil (4.5 ± 0.2), Eosinophil (0.5 ± 0.1) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (32.4 ± 1.1) values of the infected birds were lower than the non-infected birds, but the mean, Basophils (0.1 ± 0.0), Lymphocyte (9.7 ± 0.3), Monocyte (0.6 ± 0.1), and WBC (1.5 ± 0.4), values of infected birds was higher than non-infected ( Table 5). The infected birds showed severe anaemia, hypoprothinaemia, neutropaemia, and easinopaenia, whereas also showed leucocytosis, lymphocytosis, and monocytosis. The erythrocyte diameter of the non-infected birds was higher than the infected ones as the infected birds had a lot of microcytes in peripheral blood . There was also haemolytic anemia in a few of the birds. Fragments, micronuclei, blebbed, and notched nuclear changes were observed in the birds with haemoparasitic infection; however, the severity of these changes was more in the haemoproteus and plasmodium infections. The biochemistry findings showed that the mean of Albumin (33.1 ± 1.2), AST (54.9 ± 0.9), ALT (88.3 ± 4.1), ALP (1.5 ± 0.7), BUN (14.9 ± 1.6), Potassium (3.2 ± 0.2), and Calcium (1.5 ± 0.3) values of the infected bird were not significantly different to the non-infected birds, but the mean of Globulin (36.0 ± 1.4), Bilirubin (7.5 ± 0.3), Glucose (55.3 ± 6.7), Creatinin (26.3 ± 1.9), Sodium(1.1 ± 0.8), Phosphorus (1.9 ± 0.2), and Amylase (1.4 ± 0.2) values of infected birds were higher than the non-infected ( p ≥ 0.05) ( Table 6).
Table 5.Haematological parameters of haemoparasite infected and non-infected poultry birds
Parameters |
Non-infected (Mean) |
infected (Mean) |
Packed cell volume (%) |
33.3 ± 0.9 |
26.8 ± 1.5 |
Plasma protein |
6.2 ± 1.3 |
5.8 ± 1.1 |
Haemoglobin concentration (g/dl) |
9.8 ± 1.9 |
8.6 ± 2.6 |
Red blood cell (10°6/ul) |
3.9 ± 0.6 |
3.0 ± 0.1 |
White blood cell (×10°3) |
1.5 ± 0.3 |
1.5 ± 0.4 |
Platelet ((×10°3/ul) |
155.5 ± 7.3 |
168.4 ± 7.8 |
Lymphocyte (%) |
9.3 ± 0.2 |
9.7 ± 0.3 |
Heterophils (%) |
4.7 ± 0.1 |
4.5 ± 0.2 |
Monocyte (%) |
0.5 ± 0.1 |
0.6 ± 0.1 |
Eosinophil (%) |
0.5 ± 0.1 |
0.5 ± 0.1 |
Basophils (%) |
0.1 ± 0.0 |
0.1 ± 0.0 |
Mean cell volume (fl) |
106.6 ± 1.7 |
109.8 ± 1.8 |
Mean corpuscular Haemoglobin concentration (g/dl) |
34.5 ± 4.5 |
35.6 ± 4.9 |
Mean corpuscular Haemoglobin (pg) |
32.5 ± 1.2 |
32.4 ± 1.1 |
Table 6.Biochemical parameters of haemoparasite infected and non-infected poultry birds.
Parameters |
Non infected (Mean) |
Infected (Mean) |
Globulin (g/dl) |
34.7 ± 1.3 |
36.0 ± 1.4 |
Albumin (g/dl) |
37.8 ± 1.8 |
33.1 ± 1.2 |
Asparate aminotransferase (ul) |
55.1 ± 0.8 |
54.9 ± 0.9 |
Alaine aminotransferase (ul) |
90.6 ± 9.9 |
88.3 ± 4.1 |
Alkaline phosphatase (ul) |
1.7 ± 0.1 |
1.5 ± 0.7 |
Bilirubin |
6.9 ± 0.2 |
7.5 ± 0.3 |
Glucose |
49.7 ± 5.7 |
55.3 ± 6.7 |
Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dl) |
16.4 ± 1.2 |
14.9 ± 1.6 |
Creatinine |
22.5 ± 1.5 |
26.3 ± 1.9 |
Sodium |
1.1 ± 0.1 |
1.1 ± 0.8 |
Potassium |
3.3 ± 0.4 |
3.2 ± 0.2 |
Calcium |
1.7 ± 0.2 |
1.5 ± 0.3 |
Phosphorus |
1.8 ± 0.2 |
1.9 ± 0.2 |
Amylase |
1.2 ± 0.1 |
1.4 ± 0.1 |
Diameter |
1.9 ± 0.5 |
1.9 ± 0.4 |
Furthermore, RBC morphological changes were observed in varying degrees, with 213 (54.6%) samples showing no changes, while 9 (2.31%) showing RBC morphological changes, 93 (23.85%) exhibiting mild alterations, 63 (16.15%) displaying moderate changes, and 9 (2.31%) demonstrating severe changes ( Table 7). Also toxic changes in neutrophils (Plate F). Notably, there was an association between haemoparasitemia and the severity of RBC morphological changes, suggesting a potential relationship between parasitic infection and erythrocyte pathology in birds. On the relationship between parasite presence and changes in WBC morphology; 216 cases were classified as negative, indicating no observable impact of parasites on WBC morphology. 174 cases were classified as positive, suggesting that parasites were associated with changes in WBC morphology. Among the positive cases: 132 cases exhibited mild changes in WBC morphology. 9 cases showed moderate changes in WBC morphology ( Table 7). The absence of moderate changes in WBC morphology among negative cases indicates that such changes are likely attributed to the presence of parasites.
Table 7.Red blood cell and white blood cell morphological changes in haemoparasite infected birds.
|
|
Negative |
Positive |
Total |
RBC |
WBC |
RBC |
WBC |
|
|
RBC and WBC morphological |
Negative |
213 |
141 |
9 |
108 |
222 |
249 |
Mild |
3 |
75 |
93 |
57 |
96 |
132 |
Moderate |
0 |
0 |
63 |
9 |
63 |
9 |
Severe |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
Total |
216 |
216 |
174 |
0 |
390 |
390 |
Discussion
Of the 390 samples analyzed, 174 (44.6%) tested positive for haemoparasites, indicating a significant presence of these pathogens within the avian population under study. The clinical signs aligned with findings from previous research and it is in agreement with Mirzaei et al. [ 12]. Increased intensity of parasitic infection or different parasites in the same birds may contribute to the mortality of Poultry birds’ species because hemoparasites cause anemia by affecting red blood cells, which may be further damaged by immune response [ 14, 15]. The level of anemia observed in the birds infected with the haemoparasite correlated as most of the birds with some haemoparasites turned out to have anaemia, microcytosis, and hypoprotaemia. The prevalence and distribution of the different hemoparasites found in this investigation were in disagreement with Naqvi et al . [ 16] who encountered only three genera parasites ( Haemoproteus, Leucocytozoon, and Plasmodium). The high distribution of haemoparasites in this study may be due to variations in climatic conditions and seasons of the research, which are some of the determinants of the activities of vectors which transmit these parasites. Daphey and Nmorsi [ 17] conclude that a number of factors, including rainfall, changes in habitat composition, host age and time of day of collection, proximity to vector breeding grounds, relative host resistance, and local temperature variations, can influence variations in prevalence.
The overall prevalence of parasites 44.6% observed in this study is significantly lower than 53.3% that was reported by Ogbaje et al. [ 18] in Markurdi Major Markets (Nigeria). This may be due to the geographical variation including temperature, humidity and the presence of suitable vectors. The high prevalence of Plasmodium spp with 51.72%, suggests the burden followed by Haemoproteus and Babesia spp with 3.45% and the least prevalent were in microfilaria and leukocytozoon (1.72%). It is an agreement with many research conducted in Nigeria including Ogbaje et al. [ 18] who reported the highest prevalence of plasmodium may be due to the vector abundance because plasmodium species are commonly transmitted by mosquitoes, which are widespread and abundant in various environment [ 19].
The findings of this study indicate a notable discrepancy in the prevalence of haemoparasites between different breed. Specifically, the data suggests that laying birds exhibit a higher incidence of haemoparasitic infections compared to broilers. This disparity could be attributed to several factors inherent to the respective production systems and biological characteristics of the chicken breeds. Layers chickens, which are typically raised for egg production over an extended period, may experience higher exposure to environmental conditions conducive to haemoparasite transmission. Factors such as prolonged exposure to outdoor environments, increased contact with vectors, and potential stressors associated with egg-laying activities could contribute to their heightened susceptibility. Furthermore, the relatively longer lifespan of layers compared to broilers may provide a larger window of opportunity for haemoparasite acquisition and accumulation over time. Additionally, selective breeding for enhanced growth rates in broilers may inadvertently confer some degree of resistance or tolerance to certain parasites. This investigation showed that the poultry birds within cage rearing (62%) were more infected than the floor rearing (38%). That is very surprising in floor rearing birds have more space to move around and access to litter. This may influence exposure to parasites whereases in cages rearing birds are confined which can limited movement that affect parasites transmission. From floor rearing there is potential of exposing birds to parasites present in the contact with feces and liter otherwise from cages rearing is limited contact with liter, reducing the direct exposure to parasites found in feces.
According to the different locations that samples were collected to the farm G were most prevalent with haemoparasites, and the least prevalent was in farm. This could be due to the several factors such as environmental condition which is more preserved, vector population, management system and climate and seasonal patterns. And more so the number of birds sampled in this area, further studies should cover more birds in the different locations. The high prevalence of male birds compared to the females in this study is an disagreement with Scaglione et al. [ 20] and Opara et al. [ 21] who indicated that the females were more parasitized because the reduction of the locomotion activity during the nesting period may contribute as factor of increasing the probability of the infection with haemosporidians. According to Naqvi et al. [ 16] the precise reason for increased haemoparasitic infection in females is unknown, however higher progesterone and prolactin levels often weaken the immune system and increase susceptibility to infection in general. Well, the reason for our observation could be increase the immune response of the male birds. The low prevalent rate recorded in younger birds, while higher in adults’ birds that may be due to repeated parasite exposure, the choice of habitats, different migration and movement pattern compared to young and interactions with vectors. Gametocytes encircle the nucleus of parasitized erythrocytes, leading to hemolysis and resulting in anemia. Haemoproteus meleagridis causes fatalities in young poults and surviving turkeys may be lame and have reduced growth and weight gain according to Cardona et al. [ 22]. Ogbaje et al. [ 18] showed that there were no differences in the prevalence of bird infections in different age groups.
The prevalence of poultry infection with parasites were higher for the birds that were sampled during rainy season than dry season is an agreement with Ogbaje et al. [ 18] that may be due to vector survival and environmental condition because during the rainy season usually there is a lot of sources of water that can create suitable habitats for both parasites and their vector. The establishment of preventative and control strategies for both domesticated and wild fowl could benefit greatly from the significant role that seasonality plays in the vector and the spread of haemoparasites according to Omonona et al. [ 23]. The results showed that there were statistical significance differences for some of the haematology of the infected and non-infected Poultry birds, just as was reported by Ogbaje et al. [ 23]. According to Daphey and Nmorsi [ 17] the mean value of PCV, Hb, RBC, Lymphocyte, MCV, and MCHC in the infected with blood parasites were lower than the non-infected. These results are similar and the anemia was regenerative because newly produced red blood cells increase in numbers and these cells are larger than mature cells. If the value is below normal and the bird is anemic, then this indicates a non-regenerative state according to Mitchell et al. [ 24]. According to Motta et al. [ 25] the monocytes play an important role in phagocytic activity and antigen processing in birds. Gaspar et al. [ 26] had reported that acute phase response to disease is often accompanied by the recruitment of neutrophils into circulating blood resulting in a blood neutrophilia. Like neutrophils, their counterpart in birds, heterophils, are critically involved in the immediate response to pathogens [ 27]. There are two common types of changes observed in heterophils during the course of disease processes in birds. One change is the presence of immature cells in the peripheral blood, representing recruitment of cells from the bone marrow in response to cytokines and other inflammatory mediators; the other important change observed in avian heterophils during disease is toxic change [ 13]. The Globulin, Bilirubin, Glucose, Creatinine, Phosphorus and Amylase were higher in infected than the non-infected whereases the albumin, AST, ALT, ALP, BUN, Potassium and Calcium were higher in non-infected birds than the infected birds. The high values of Asparate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin and creatinine and Amylase revealed in this study with infected bird may indicate liver disease, damage of skeletal muscle with myocardial diseases and proventricular dilation diseases. Plasma biochemistry is especially important in avian species, which frequently show minimal overt clinical signs of disease, even when seriously ill. Therefore, the need for accurate and useful biochemical analysis to successfully diagnose and treat avian species cannot be overemphasized, Harr et al. [ 28]. The hematological and biochemical parameters of poultry birds were tested to know the differences between the hematological parameters and the biochemical parameters of the species [ 29, 30].
Globulins are produced in the liver. Globulins, albumins, and fibrinogen are major blood proteins. Low globulin can be a sign of liver or kidney disease. High level may indicate infection, inflammatory disease or immune disorders. High levels of globulin may cause such type of cancers like multiple myeloma, malignant lymphoma. Also, Globulin level has been used as indicator of immune responses and sources of antibody production. They also help during the time of fight infection and transport of nutrients. The increase level of globulin concentration might confer higher disease resistance capacity of chicken Mohanty et al. [ 29]. A slight degree of polychromasia is common in healthy birds; one reference interval for healthy psittacines reports that polychromatophils comprised 0.41%–6.78% of all erythrocytes. Slight anisocytosis is also considered an unremarkable finding in birds [ 24, 26]. Prominent anisocytosis may be seen with regenerative anemia or with dyserythropoiesis, however, and was seen in blood smears from marine birds exposed to crude oil [ 17]. Haematological and biochemical studies, which can reveal the function of the kidney, liver, and bone marrow, among other organs, are an invaluable resource for learning about avian health [ 30].The establishment of preventative and control strategies for both domesticated and wild fowl could benefit greatly from the significant role that seasonality plays in the vector and the spread of haemoparasites [ 23].
Conclusion and Recommendations
The comparative analysis of haematological parameters and biochemical profiles in poultry birds has revealed crucial value in their health status. This study establishes these parameters as reliable indicators of avian health. Furthermore, through extensive examination, it has been determined that variables such as species, sex, location, breed, management system, and origin significantly influence the prevalence of haemoparasites among poultry populations. Particularly, avian haemoparasites, including those from the genera Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, and Leucocytozoon, exhibit diverse prevalence rates, shaped by various environmental factors. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of avian health management and underscores the importance of monitoring haematological parameters and blood profiles in poultry farming practice To reduce haemoparasites infections in Poultry birds, it is recommended to implement strict biosecurity protocols to prevent the entry of infected birds or vectors like mosquitos, tick and flies, insecticides or acaricides use approved for poultry birds and mosquito net may play important role for preventing blood parasites infection, regular health checks and maintaining a clean and dry environment to avoid the growth of parasites vectors.
Authors contributions
Compliance with ethical standards: The study was carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the regulation approved by the University of Ibadan’s Animal care and use Research Ethics Committee (UI-ACUREC/034-0423/18).
Consent to participate
Consent for publication was obtained for every individual person’s data included in the study.
Funding
This work was supported by the African Union Commission under Grant Pan African University life and Earth Sciences Institute (including Health and Agriculture), Ibadan, Nigeria.
Disclosure statement
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Ethical approval
The protocol was reviewed and approved by institutional animal care and use research ethics committee with number (UI-ACUREC/034-0423/18) All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
References
1. Heise H, Crisan A, Theuvsen L. The poultry market in Nigeria: market structures and potential for investment in the market. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev 2015; 18:197–222.
2. Ewubare DB, Ozar V. Effect of poultry production on agricultural production in Nigeria. Economy 2018; 5:8–16.
3. Lawal JR, Ibrahim UI, Biu AA, Musa HI. Molecular detection of avian haemosporidian parasites in village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) in Gombe State. Nigeria J Vet Med Anim Sci 2022; 5:1095.
4. Dhamayanti E, Priyowidodo D, Nurcahyo W, Firdausy LW. Morphological and molecular characteristics of Plasmodium juxtanucleare in layer chicken from three districts of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Vet World 2023; 16:1576–83.
5. Bell JA, Weckstein JD, Fecchio A, Tkach VV. A new real-time PCR protocol for detection of avian haemosporidians. Parasit Vectors 2015; 8:1–9.
6. Binkienė R, Chagas CRF, Bernotienė R, Valkiūnas G. Molecular and morphological characterization of three new species of avian Onchocercidae (Nematoda) with emphasis on circulating microfilariae. Parasit Vectors 2021; 14:1–19.
7. Nourani L, Aliabadian M, Mirshamsi O, Djadid ND. Molecular detection and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidian parasites in iran. PLoS One 2018; 13:1–16.
8. Rodrigues RA, Massara RL, Bailey LL, Pichorim M, Moreira PA, Braga ÉM. Using a multistate occupancy approach to determine molecular diagnostic accuracy and factors affecting avian haemosporidian infections. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1):8480.
9. Chagas CRF, Harl J, Preikša V, Bukauskaitė D, Ilgūnas M, Weissenböck H, et al. Lankesterella (Apicomplexa, Lankesterellidae) blood parasites of passeriform birds: prevalence, molecular and morphological characterization, with notes on sporozoite persistence in vivo and development in vitro. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11(5):1451.
10. de Angeli Dutra D, Fecchio A, Martins Braga É, Poulin R. Migratory birds have higher prevalence and richness of avian haemosporidian parasites than residents. Int J Parasitol 2021; 51:877–82.
11. Fajuyigbe O, Balogun VF, Obembe OM. Web-based Geographical Information System (GIS) for tourism in Oyo State, Nigeria. Inf Technol J 2007; 6:613–22.
12. Mirzaei F, Siyadatpanah A, Norouzi R, Pournasir S, Nissapatorn V, Pereira ML. Blood parasites in domestic birds in central Iran. Vet Sci 2020; 7:1–7.
13. Hong D, Liyun C, Fuwei LI, Qiaoxian Y, Dehe W, Rongyan Z, et al. Research note: effect of age on hematological parameter and reference intervals for commercial Lohmann silver layer. Poult Sci 2021; (12):101497.
14. Opara M, Oguobi F, Adiele E, Jegede O. Survey of haemoparasites and haematology of Scavenging ducks (Anas platyhyncha) in Owerri Southeastern Nigeria, J Vet Adv 2016; 6:1325–31.
15. Waruiru RM, Mavuti SK, Mbuthia PG, Njagi LW, Mutune MN, Otieno RO. Prevalence of ecto- and haemo-parasites of free-range local ducks in Kenya. Age 2017; 51:100–5.
16. Naqvi MA ul H, Khan MK, Iqbal Z, Rizwan HM, Khan MN, Naqvi SZ, et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors of haemoparasites, and their effects on hematological profile in domesticated chickens in District Layyah, Punjab, Pakistan. Prev Vet Med 2017; 143:49–53.
17. Daphey OE, Nmorsi OPG. 2023. Parasites associated with open markets vegetables: implication for public health interventions in Ethiope East, Southern Nigeria. Int J Trop Dis Health2023; 44(2):1–9.
18. Ogbaje C, Okpe J, Oke P. Haemoparasites and haematological parameters of nigerian indigenous (local) and exotic (broiler) chickens slaughtered in makurdi major markets, Benue State, Nigeria. Alex J Vet Sci 2019; 63:90.
19. Hossain MS, Dey AR, Alam MZ. Prevalence of malaria parasites in indigenous chickens and ducks in selected districts of Bangladesh. J Bangladesh Agric Univ 2017; 15:260–5.
20. Scaglione FE, Pregel P, Cannizzo FT, Perez-Rodriguez AD, Ferroglio E, Bollo E. Prevalence of new and known species of haemoparasites in feral pigeons in northwest Italy. Malaria J 2015; 14:1–5.
21. Opara MN, Ogbuewu IP, Njoku L, Ihesie EK, Etuk IF. Study of the haematological and biochemical values and gastrointestinal and haemoparasites in racing pigeons (Columba livia check for this species in other resources) in Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria. Rev Cient UDO Agrícola 2012; 12(4):955–9.
22. Cardona CJ, Ihejirika A, McClellan L. Haemoproteus lophortyx infection in bobwhite quail. Avian Dis 2002; 46:249–55.
23. Omonona OA, Jubril AJ, Adekola AA. Prevalence of haemoparasites in village weaver (Ploceus cucullatus) in Ibadan, Nigeria. J World’s Poul Res 2014; 4:89–93.
24. Mitchell EB, Johns J, Clinical D. Avian hematology and related disorders. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 2008; 11:501–22.
25. Motta ROC, Romero Marques MV, Ferreira Junior FC, Andery DA, Horta RS, Peixoto RB, et al. Does haemosporidian infection affect hematological and biochemical profiles of the endangered Black-fronted piping-guan (Aburria jacutinga)? PeerJ 2013; 1:e45.
26. Gaspar H, Bargallo F, Grifols J, Correia E, Pinto MD. Haematological reference intervals in captive African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Vet Med 2021; 66:24–31.
27. Jax E, Müller I, Börno S, Borlinghaus H, Eriksson G, Fricke E, et al. Health monitoring in birds using bio loggers and whole blood transcriptomics. Sci Rep 2021; 11:1–13.
28. Harr KE. Diagnostic value of biochemistry. Avian Med 2012; 2:611–29.
29. Mohanty S, Mohapatra S, Acharya G. Comparative haematology and biochemical parametrs of indigenous and broiler chicken. Int J Sci Technol Res 2020; 9:965–71.
30. Apache J, Rodríguez Almonacid CC, Moreno Torres CA, Gamba Suarez BA, Matta NE. Hemoparasite occurrence and hematological/serum chemistry variations in Podocnemis vogli turtles: a comparative analysis between wild-residing infected specimens and captive non-infected counterparts. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Rep 2023; 45:100928.
|