E-ISSN 2983-757X
 

Review Article
Online Published: 11 May 2024


Eissa, Mostafa: Investigating the gut microbiome’s role in antibiotic resistance in companion animals

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic resistance poses a growing concern in veterinary medicine, jeopardizing animal health and public health. Overuse and misuse of antibiotics have led to the emergence of bacteria resistant to these medications, rendering them ineffective. This overview screening article explores the potential link between disruptions in the gut microbiome and the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in companion animals. The gut microbiome, a complex ecosystem of microorganisms residing in the digestive tract, plays a crucial role in maintaining health. However, antibiotic use can disrupt this delicate balance, leading to microbiome dysbiosis. This imbalance creates an opportunity for antibiotic-resistant bacteria to flourish. These resistant bacteria, often harboring genes allowing them to evade antibiotic effects, can then spread within the gut and potentially pose a threat to the effectiveness of future antibiotic treatments. Understanding the microbiome-resistance connection is essential for developing strategies to combat antibiotic resistance. Outlining a research approach to investigate this link, employing methods like animal models, microbiome analysis through 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and antibiotic resistance profiling would be reviewed. By elucidating the mechanisms by which microbiome disruptions contribute to the emergence of resistant bacteria, we can pave the way for novel interventions. These interventions could include the use of probiotics, prebiotics, or fecal microbiota transplantation to restore a healthy gut microbiome and limit the selection and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. By harnessing the power of the gut microbiome, we can ensure the continued effectiveness of antibiotics in treating bacterial infections in companion animals and safeguard animal health and well-being.

Introduction

The rise of antibiotic resistance is a growing concern in veterinary medicine, posing a significant threat to animal health and public health [1]. Antibiotics are life-saving drugs used to treat bacterial infections in companion animals such as dogs and cats [2]. However, the overuse and misuse of antibiotics have led to the emergence of bacteria resistant to these medications [3]. This renders these antibiotics ineffective, leaving veterinarians with limited treatment options for serious infections.
One potential factor contributing to antibiotic resistance lies within the complex ecosystem residing in the gut—the gut microbiome. This vast community of microorganisms plays a crucial role in digestion, immunity, and overall health [4]. Recent research suggests a potential link between disruptions in the gut microbiome and the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in companion animals [5]. This article probes into this exciting area of research, investigating the gut microbiome’s role in antibiotic resistance and its potential implications for animal health [6]. By understanding this connection, we may pave the way for novel strategies to combat antibiotic resistance and ensure the continued effectiveness of these essential medications in companion animals.

The growing Threat of Antibiotic Resistance in Companion Animals

The widespread use of antibiotics in veterinary medicine has undoubtedly saved countless companion animals from life-threatening bacterial infections. However, the overuse and misuse of these medications have led to a significant and growing public health concern, namely antibiotic resistance. This phenomenon occurs when bacteria develop mechanisms to evade the effects of antibiotics, rendering the drugs ineffective in treating infections they were once designed to combat [7,2]. There are several examples of antibiotic resistance in companion animals as shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Examples of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in companion animals.
Bacterium* Antibiotic class Infection Concerns
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Penicillins Skin and wound infections Difficult to treat, potential zoonotic risk
Fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli) Fluoroquinolones Urinary tract infections Limited treatment options
Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Cephalosporins Pneumonia, other infections Reduced effectiveness of last-resort antibiotics
*References [21-26]
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), once primarily affecting hospitalized humans, is now increasingly found in dogs and cats, particularly those in veterinary hospitals or breeding facilities [8]. MRSA infections in companion animals can be difficult to treat and pose a potential zoonotic risk, meaning they can be transmitted to humans [9]. Fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli is a common intestinal bacterium, but some strains can cause severe urinary tract infections [10]. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics were once commonly used to treat these infections in dogs, but the emergence of resistant strains has limited treatment options [11].
Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae; this bacterium can cause pneumonia and other infections in dogs and cats [12]. Third-generation cephalosporins are broad-spectrum antibiotics often used as a last resort in such cases [13]. The emergence of resistant strains poses a significant challenge for veterinary treatment [14]. Factors contributing to antibiotic resistance in companion animals involve multifaceted inappropriate use of antimicrobial medications.
Prophylactic antibiotic use refers to administering antibiotics to healthy animals to prevent infections, a practice sometimes used in breeding facilities or before surgeries that can contribute to resistance development [15]. Incomplete antibiotic courses occur when pet owners may discontinue antibiotic treatment prematurely when their pet seems to improve. This allows surviving bacteria, including potentially resistant strains, to multiply [16]. The extra-label use of antibiotics pertains to using antibiotics for purposes not approved by veterinary authorities, such as treating viral infections, is a misuse that can contribute to resistance [17].

Consequences of Antibiotic Resistance in Companion Animals

Limited treatment options are one consequence of antibiotic resistance. When antibiotics become ineffective, veterinarians have fewer options to treat serious infections, leading to longer illnesses, increased discomfort for animals, and potentially higher costs for pet owners [18]. Increased risk of surgical complications is another hurdle that could be aroused from the antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotics are often used prophylactically before and after surgeries to prevent infections. Resistance makes such procedures riskier [19]. Moreover, zoonotic transmission is a crucial challenging problem. Resistant bacteria can potentially transfer from animals to humans, posing a threat to public health [20].
The growing threat of antibiotic resistance in companion animals necessitates a multipronged approach [27]. This includes promoting responsible antibiotic use in veterinary medicine, developing and adopting alternatives to antibiotics for infection prevention and control, and investing in research on novel therapies to combat resistant bacteria [28]. By taking these steps, we can safeguard the health of our companion animals and protect public health from the growing threat of antibiotic resistance [29].

The Gut Microbiome as a Complex Ecosystem of Microorganisms and Potential Link Between Gut Microbiome Disruption and Antibiotic Resistance

The gut microbiome, a universe of microorganisms residing within the digestive tract, plays a critical role in maintaining health. However, this complex ecosystem can be disrupted by various factors, including antibiotic use [30]. When antibiotics target harmful bacteria, they inadvertently kill beneficial ones as well, leading to microbiome dysbiosis [31]. This imbalance can create an opportunity for antibiotic-resistant bacteria to flourish [32]. These resistant bacteria, often harboring genes allowing them to evade antibiotic effects, can then spread within the gut and potentially pose a threat to the effectiveness of future antibiotic treatments [33]. Understanding the link between microbiome disruption and antibiotic resistance is crucial for developing strategies to protect the gut microbiome and combat the growing threat of antibiotic resistance in companion animals.

Composition and function of the gut microbiome

The gut microbiome of companion animals, such as dogs and cats, plays a crucial role in maintaining their overall health and well-being. Composed of trillions of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses, the gut microbiome is responsible for a variety of functions within the digestive system [34]. One of the primary functions of the gut microbiome is to aid in the digestion and absorption of nutrients from food. Certain bacteria within the microbiome are able to break down complex carbohydrates and fibers that the animal’s own digestive enzymes cannot process [35]. This allows for a more efficient extraction of nutrients from the food they consume. Additionally, the gut microbiome plays a key role in regulating the immune system of companion animals [36]. A healthy balance of beneficial bacteria in the gut helps to prevent the overgrowth of harmful pathogens, reducing the risk of infections and diseases. Furthermore, the gut microbiome is also involved in the production of essential vitamins and short-chain fatty acids that are important for overall health [37]. These compounds help to maintain the integrity of the gut lining, regulate inflammation, and support a healthy immune response. Thus, the composition and function of the gut microbiome in companion animals are essential for their overall health and well-being [38]. Providing a balanced diet, regular exercise, and probiotic supplements can help to maintain a healthy gut microbiome and support the overall health of our beloved pets.

Key bacterial communities residing in the gut of companion animals

The gut microbiome of companion animals, such as dogs and cats, is a complex ecosystem teeming with trillions of microorganisms. These diverse communities play a crucial role in digestion, immunity, and overall health [39]. Table 2 shows a breakdown of some key bacterial communities residing in the gut of companion animals.
Table 2.
Key bacterial communities in the gut microbiome of companion animals.
Bacterial Community** Description Function*
Bacteroides Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, anaerobic Breakdown complex carbohydrates, produce short-chain fatty acids
Firmicutes Gram-positive, diverse species Energy production, vitamin synthesis, immune regulation
Proteobacteria Diverse phylum, includes both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria Nutrient breakdown, fermentation, potential pathogenicity
Actinobacteria Gram-positive, produce antibiotics and bioactive compounds Inhibit harmful bacteria, promote immune function
Additional considerations to be noted,
The relative abundance of these bacterial communities can vary depending on various factors, such as diet, age, and health status.
Maintaining a balanced and diverse gut microbiome is crucial for optimal health in companion animals.
* Functional roles of the gut microbiome in digestion, immunity, and health.
** References [5967]
Description: These are Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, anaerobic bacteria.
Function: They play a vital role in breaking down complex carbohydrates and producing short-chain fatty acids that nourish the gut lining [4042].
Visual representation: Figure 1
Figure 1.
Rod-shaped: Bacteroides are typically rod-shaped, although they can sometimes appear slightly curved or pleomorphic (variable in shape). Gram-negative: Their cell wall structure lacks the thick peptidoglycan layer characteristic of Gram-positive bacteria, resulting in a pink color during Gram staining. Unlike some other bacteria, Bacteroides species are generally non-motile, meaning they lack flagella for movement [43].
Description: These are Gram-positive bacteria, including a diverse range of species.
Function: They are involved in various metabolic processes, including energy production, vitamin synthesis, and immune regulation [44].
Visual representation: Figure 2
Figure 2.
Examples of cocci-shaped bacteria online, representing the general morphology of Firmicutes. Staphylococcus aureus, description, round, gram-positive bacteria that can form grape-like clusters [45]. Some S. aureus strains are beneficial members of the gut microbiome, while others can cause infections [46]. Streptococcus spp., description, spherical or ovoid-shaped, gram-positive bacteria that often form chains [47]. Some Streptococcus species are important for gut health, while others can cause infections in various parts of the body [48].
Description: This diverse phylum includes both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria.
Function: Some species contribute to nutrient breakdown and fermentation, while others can cause disease [49].
Visual representation: Figure 3
Figure 3.
Some examples of rod-shaped bacteria commonly found in the phylum Proteobacteria. Escherichia coli, description, gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria commonly found in the gut. Salmonella enterica, description, gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria that can cause food poisoning. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, description, gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria commonly found in soil and water, can cause opportunistic infections. Klebsiella pneumoniae, description, gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria that can cause pneumonia and other infections [5053]. These are just a few examples of the diverse range of rod-shaped bacteria that belong to the phylum Proteobacteria. The specific species present in the gut microbiome can vary depending on various factors.
Description: These Gram-positive bacteria are known for producing antibiotics and other bioactive compounds.
Function: They contribute to gut health by inhibiting the growth of harmful bacteria and promoting immune function [54,55].
Visual representation: Figure 4
Figure 4.
Some examples of rod-shaped bacteria commonly found in the phylum Actinobacteria. Bifidobacterium spp., description, gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria that are important for gut health and immune function. Mycobacterium spp., description, gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria that can cause various diseases, including tuberculosis and leprosy. Corynebacterium spp., description, gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria that are involved in skin and mucous membrane health. These are just a few examples of the diverse range of rod-shaped bacteria that belong to the phylum Actinobacteria [5658]. While many Actinobacteria are filamentous, some species can exhibit rod-shaped morphology.

Antibiotic-Induced Microbiome Dysbiosis

Antibiotic-induced microbiome dysbiosis is a common issue in companion animals that can have significant impacts on their health. When antibiotics are administered to treat infections, they not only target the harmful bacteria causing the illness, but also disrupt the balance of beneficial bacteria in the gut microbiome [68]. This disruption can lead to a condition known as dysbiosis, where there is an imbalance in the composition of the gut microbiome. This dysbiosis can result in a variety of negative effects on the animal’s health, including digestive issues, immune system dysfunction, and increased susceptibility to infections [69]. Furthermore, antibiotic-induced microbiome dysbiosis can also lead to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, making future infections more difficult to treat [70]. It is important for pet owners and veterinarians to be aware of the potential consequences of antibiotic use and to take steps to mitigate the impact on the gut microbiome [71]. Strategies such as probiotic supplementation, prebiotic foods, and antibiotic stewardship practices can help to restore the balance of the gut microbiome and support the overall health of companion animals after antibiotic treatment.

The effect of antibiotic use on the composition and diversity of the gut microbiome

Antibiotics play a vital role in treating bacterial infections in companion animals. However, their use can have significant consequences for the gut microbiome, leading to disruptions in its composition and diversity (Fig. 5). One primary effect of antibiotics is the direct killing of bacteria [72]. These broad-spectrum medications target a wide range of bacteria, including both beneficial and harmful ones [73]. This direct killing can significantly reduce the overall population of gut bacteria, leading to a decline in diversity (Fig. 6). Another consequence of antibiotic use is altered competition within the gut microbiome. The depletion of beneficial bacteria creates an ecological niche, essentially an empty space within the gut ecosystem [74]. This allows for opportunistic pathogens, which are often resistant to the antibiotics used, to overgrow and dominate the gut microbiome.
Figure 5.
Pareto chart summarizes the relative abundance of bacterial taxa identified through a principal coordinates analysis [after adoption from, https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40168-020-00991-x/figures/1] [79]. The chart depicts the percentage of total abundance contributed by each taxa, revealing the most dominant members of the bacterial community. Key findings, Lachnospiracea incertae sedis and Bacteroides are the most abundant taxa, together accounting for approximately 48% of the total bacterial community. Several other taxa, including Akkermansia, Alistipes, Parabacteroides, and Lactobacillus, contribute between 5% and 10% each. The remaining taxa each contribute less than 5% of the total abundance [69]. This analysis highlights the uneven distribution of bacterial taxa within the community, with a few dominant members representing a significant portion of the overall population.
Figure 6.
Impact of antibiotic treatment on total bacterial count. The pre-antibiotic bar represents the initial bacterial population [80]. During antibiotic treatment, the bacterial count significantly decreases, as indicated by the shorter bar. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the antibiotic in reducing the bacterial load [81]. The post-antibiotic bar shows the remaining bacterial population after treatment [82]. While reduced, some bacteria may persist, highlighting the potential for re-growth or the presence of antibiotic-resistant strains [83]. This graph emphasizes the ability of antibiotics to control bacterial populations, but also suggests the importance of monitoring post-treatment bacterial levels to manage potential re-emergence.
Furthermore, antibiotic use can exert selection pressure for antibiotic resistance [75]. Antibiotics have the potential ability to select for bacteria harboring resistance genes [76]. These resistant bacteria survive and reproduce, while susceptible bacteria are killed [32]. This leads to an enrichment of antibiotic-resistant bacteria within the gut microbiome over time [77]. The severity of these effects depends on various factors, such as the type and duration of antibiotic use, the health status of the animal, and the initial composition of the gut microbiome [78]. Restoring a healthy gut microbiome after antibiotic use may require interventions like probiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation.

Mechanisms by Which Antibiotics can Disrupt the Microbial Balance

Antibiotics are vital tools in veterinary medicine, effectively treating bacterial infections in companion animals [73]. However, their broad-spectrum action often disrupts the delicate balance of the gut microbiome, leading to potential health complications [74]. Tables 36 explore the key mechanisms by which antibiotics disrupt the microbial balance and the resulting consequences.
Table 3.
Consequences of antibiotic use on the gut microbiome.
Effect* Description**
Direct killing Antibiotics kill both beneficial and harmful bacteria, reducing overall diversity.
Altered competition Elimination of beneficial bacteria allows opportunistic pathogens to thrive.
Selection for resistance Antibiotics select for bacteria harboring resistance genes, leading to the emergence of resistant strains.
*The severity of these effects depends on various factors, such as the type and duration of antibiotic use, the health status of the animal, and the initial composition of the gut microbiome. Restoring a healthy gut microbiome after antibiotic use may require interventions like probiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation.
** References [32,79,84]
Table 4.
Consequences of antibiotic-induced microbiome disruption.
Consequence* Explanation**
Increased susceptibility to infections Depletion of beneficial bacteria can weaken the gut’s ability to fight off pathogens.
Digestive problems Disruptions in the gut microbiome can lead to diarrhea, constipation, and other digestive issues.
Weakened immune system Gut bacteria play a vital role in immune function. Disruptions can lead to increased susceptibility to various diseases.
Increased risk of antibiotic resistance Selection of resistant bacteria contributes to the overall problem of antibiotic resistance.
*The severity and duration of these effects depend on various factors, such as the type and duration of antibiotic use, the animal’s health status, and the composition of the pre-existing gut microbiome.
**References [5,8587]
Table 5.
Impact of antibiotics on gut microbiome composition.
Antibiotic Class* Example Antibiotic Effect on Gut Microbiome
Penicillins Amoxicillin Decreased Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus
Cephalosporins Cephalexin Decreased Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus, Enterobacteriaceae
Tetracyclines Doxycycline Decreased Bacteroides, Clostridia, Enterobacteriaceae
Macrolides Azithromycin Decreased Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus, Enterobacteriaceae
Fluoroquinolones Ciprofloxacin Decreased Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus, Enterobacteriaceae
*References [100102].
Table 6.
Impact of antibiotics on gut microbiome.
Mechanism of Disruption* Consequences
Non-specific targeting Decline in bacterial diversity, increased risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD)
Alteration of gut pH Overgrowth of opportunistic pathogens like C. difficile
Impact on immune function Increased susceptibility to infections, weakened immune response
Selection pressure for antibiotic resistance Emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria
*References [102105]

Mechanisms of Disruption

Non-specific targeting: Most antibiotics lack discrimination between beneficial and pathogenic bacteria [32]. This results in the elimination of both, leading to a decline in overall bacterial diversity.
Alteration of gut pH: Antibiotic use can alter the gut’s pH balance, favoring the growth of opportunistic pathogens like Clostridium difficile, often leading to antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) [88].
Impact on immune function: The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in immune system development and function [89]. Antibiotic-induced disruption can weaken immune responses and increase susceptibility to further infections.
Selection pressure for antibiotic resistance: Antibiotic use creates selective pressure, favoring the survival of resistant bacteria [90]. This can lead to the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains, posing a significant public health threat.

Consequences of Disruption

Diarrhea: A common side effect of antibiotic use, often caused by the overgrowth of opportunistic pathogens like C. difficile [91].
Nutritional deficiencies: Gut bacteria play a crucial role in nutrient absorption [92]. Their disruption can lead to deficiencies in vitamins and minerals.
Immune system dysfunction: Antibiotic-induced changes in the gut microbiome can weaken the immune system, increasing susceptibility to infections [93].
Metabolic disorders: Gut bacteria contribute to energy metabolism and weight regulation [94]. Their disruption can lead to metabolic imbalances.
Antibiotics are essential tools in veterinary medicine, effectively combating bacterial infections in companion animals [68,95]. However, their broad-spectrum action often disrupts the delicate balance of the gut microbiome, leading to potential health consequences [96,97].

Mechanisms of Disruption

Antibiotics primarily disrupt the microbiome through three main important mechanisms as the following [98,32,99]:
Direct Killing
Antibiotics target specific bacterial structures or processes, leading to the death of both pathogenic and beneficial bacteria.
This indiscriminate killing can cause:
Decreased bacterial diversity.
Loss of key gut functions.
Increased susceptibility to colonization by opportunistic pathogens.
Competition and Alteration of Growth Conditions
Antibiotic use can alter the competition dynamics within the gut, allowing opportunistic bacteria to flourish.
This can lead to undesirable effects and drawbacks such as:
Overgrowth of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Development of diarrhea, bloating, and other gastrointestinal issues.

Immune System Modulation

The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in immune development and function.
Antibiotic-induced disruption can:
Weaken the immune response.
Increase susceptibility to infections and autoimmune diseases.

The Microbiome-Resistance Connection

The microbiome-resistance connection in companion animals refers to the relationship between the gut microbiome and antibiotic resistance. The overuse or misuse of antibiotics can disrupt the balance of beneficial bacteria in the gut, leading to dysbiosis and creating an environment that promotes the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria [5]. When the diversity and abundance of beneficial bacteria in the gut are reduced, harmful bacteria have the opportunity to thrive and potentially acquire resistance genes [106]. These resistant bacteria can then spread to other animals, humans, or the environment, posing a significant public health concern. It is important for pet owners and veterinarians to be mindful of the impact of antibiotic use on the gut microbiome of companion animals and to practice responsible antibiotic oversight [107]. This includes using antibiotics only when necessary, following proper dosing protocols, and considering alternative treatments when appropriate [108]. By preserving the health of the gut microbiome, we can help reduce the development and spread of antibiotic resistance in companion animals.

Exploring the potential link between microbiome disruption and the selection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and investigating how gut bacteria can harbor and transfer resistance genes

Research suggests a potential link between disruptions in the gut microbiome and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in companion animals. When antibiotics disrupt the natural balance of gut bacteria, they create an ecological niche for opportunistic pathogens to thrive. These pathogens may already harbor resistance genes, allowing them to survive and reproduce even in the presence of antibiotics [109]. Additionally, gut bacteria can transfer resistance genes between each other through a process called horizontal gene transfer. This means that even non-resistant bacteria can acquire resistance genes from their resistant neighbors, further contributing to the spread of antibiotic resistance within the gut microbiome [110]. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing strategies to combat antibiotic resistance and maintain the effectiveness of these essential medications in companion animals.

Experimental Design and Methods

In investigating the gut microbiome’s role in antibiotic resistance in companion animals, experimental design and methods play a crucial role in ensuring the validity and reliability of the study findings [111]. Proper oversight is essential to maintain the ethical standards and scientific rigor of the research. The experimental design should include clear objectives, well-defined research questions, and a detailed plan for data collection and analysis [112]. Researchers should carefully consider factors such as sample size, animal selection, antibiotic administration protocols, and control groups to minimize bias and confounding variables [113]. Methods for analyzing the gut microbiome and antibiotic resistance may include next-generation sequencing techniques, culturing methods, and bioinformatic tools [114]. It is important to follow standardized protocols and quality control measures to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of the results [115]. Ethical oversight, such as approval from animal ethics committees and adherence to animal welfare guidelines, is essential to protect the well-being of the companion animals involved in the study. Transparency in reporting methods and results is also critical for the scientific community to evaluate and replicate the findings [116]. Overall, careful experimental design and oversight are essential in investigating the complex relationship between the gut microbiome and antibiotic resistance in companion animals.

Description of the planned research approach to study the microbiome-resistance connection and Methods for analyzing the gut microbiome composition and antibiotic resistance profiles.

Understanding the link between the gut microbiome and antibiotic resistance in companion animals requires a comprehensive research approach. Table 7 shows an overview of the planned methods. Animal models and studies are usually conducted on companion animals such as dogs and cats. This allows researchers to directly observe the effects of antibiotic use on the gut microbiome and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in a controlled setting. Microbiome analysis, Techniques like 16S rRNA gene sequencing will be employed to analyze the composition and diversity of the gut microbiome [117]. This method allows for the identification and quantification of different bacterial species present in the gut.
Table 7.
Methods for assessing the impact of antibiotics on the microbiome in companion animals.
Method Description Advantages Disadvantages
Animal models Studying the effects of antibiotics on gut microbiome and resistance in companion animals. Controlled environment, allows for manipulation of variables. Ethical considerations, cost, may not fully replicate natural conditions.
Microbiome analysis (16S rRNA sequencing) Identifying and quantifying bacterial communities in the gut. High throughput, provides detailed information on composition and diversity. Limited information on functional capabilities of bacteria.
Resistance gene profiling Identifying and characterizing antibiotic resistance genes in gut bacteria. Direct assessment of resistance potential. Requires specific knowledge of resistance genes and their mechanisms.
Metagenomics Analyzing the entire genetic material present in the gut microbiome. Comprehensive understanding of all microbial components, including novel resistance genes. Requires advanced technology and computational resources.
Fecal microbiota transplantation Transferring healthy gut bacteria to restore microbiome balance. Potential therapeutic approach to combat dysbiosis and resistance. Requires careful donor selection and monitoring for potential side effects.
Machine learning and computational modeling Analyzing large datasets to identify complex relationships between microbiome, resistance, and other factors. Can identify hidden patterns and predict future trends. Requires expertise in data analysis and interpretation.
(1) 16S rRNA sequencing targets a specific region of the bacterial ribosomal RNA gene, allowing for the identification and quantification of bacterial species present in a sample.
(2) Resistance gene profiling typically relies on PCR amplification and sequencing of known resistance genes, providing information about the potential for antibiotic resistance in the microbiome.
(3) Metagenomics involves sequencing all DNA present in a sample, offering a broader view of the microbiome beyond just bacterial species, including viruses and fungi.
(4) Fecal microbiota transplantation involves transferring fecal material from a healthy donor to a recipient with dysbiosis, aiming to re-establish a balanced microbiome.
(5) Machine learning algorithms can analyze large datasets of microbiome data, including 16S rRNA sequencing data, resistance gene profiles, and other relevant factors, to identify patterns and relationships that may not be readily apparent through traditional analysis methods.
References [117121]
Researchers must compare the gut microbiome composition before and after antibiotic use to assess the impact of antibiotics on bacterial communities. Antibiotic Resistance Profiling, Methods will be used to identify and characterize antibiotic resistance genes present in the gut bacteria. This could involve techniques like PCR amplification and DNA sequencing of specific resistance genes [118]. Then, the researchers can assess the prevalence of resistance genes in different bacterial species and monitor their changes over time after antibiotic use.
By combining these methods, researchers can investigate the relationship between the gut microbiome and antibiotic resistance. They can observe how antibiotic use alters the gut microbiome composition, identify the emergence of resistant bacteria, and characterize the specific resistance genes involved [119]. This information will be crucial for developing strategies to combat antibiotic resistance and preserve the effectiveness of these essential medications in companion animals.

Expected Outcomes and Future Research

Expected outcomes of research investigating the gut microbiome’s role in antibiotic resistance in companion animals may include a better understanding of how antibiotic use impacts the microbiome, the mechanisms by which bacteria develop resistance, and strategies to mitigate resistance development [122]. Future research in this area could focus on developing probiotic interventions to restore the balance of the gut microbiome post-antibiotic treatment, exploring the use of phage therapy as an alternative to antibiotics, and investigating the role of diet in shaping the gut microbiome and influencing antibiotic resistance [123,124]. Additionally, studies could investigate the transfer of antibiotic-resistant bacteria between animals and humans, the impact of environmental factors on resistance development, and the effectiveness of antibiotic administration practices in reducing resistance. Continued research in this field is crucial for developing evidence-based strategies to preserve the health of companion animals and combat antibiotic resistance.

Anticipated findings on the relationship between gut microbiome and antibiotic resistance and future research directions to elucidate underlying mechanisms and develop interventions.

Research on the gut microbiome and antibiotic resistance in companion animals is expected to reveal valuable insights. Studies are likely to demonstrate that antibiotic use disrupts the gut microbiome composition and diversity, creating an environment conducive to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria [122123]. Additionally, researchers may identify specific bacterial species and resistance genes associated with antibiotic resistance in companion animals.
Future research should focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms by which microbiome disruptions promote antibiotic resistance. This could involve investigating how changes in bacterial populations and metabolic pathways within the gut influence the selection and spread of resistant bacteria. Additionally, research should explore the development of novel interventions, such as targeted probiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation, to restore a healthy gut microbiome and combat antibiotic resistance in companion animals [125]. By understanding these connections and developing effective interventions, we can promote animal health, protect them against the growing threat of antibiotic resistance, and mitigate the risk of their spread to human owners in contact with the animals.

Conclusion: Unlocking the Microbiome’s Potential to Combat Antibiotic Resistance

Understanding the interplay between the gut microbiome and antibiotic resistance in companion animals is of paramount importance. This knowledge holds the key to developing novel strategies to combat the growing threat of antibiotic resistance. By elucidating the mechanisms by which microbiome disruptions contribute to the emergence of resistant bacteria, researchers can pave the way for the development of microbiome-based interventions. These interventions could include the use of probiotics, prebiotics, or fecal microbiota transplantation to restore a healthy gut microbiome and limit the selection and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. By harnessing the power of the gut microbiome, we can ensure the continued effectiveness of antibiotics in treating bacterial infections in companion animals and safeguard animal health and well-being. It should be noted that the effect of medications on archaea present in the gut ecosystem is another issue that needs to be addressed in other studies and by researchers to know the true impact on the health and welfare of animals and humans.

Appendix: Glossary of Scientific Terms and Expressions

This appendix provides definitions for the unique scientific terms and expressions used in the article:
  • Antibiotic resistance, the ability of bacteria to resist the effects of antibiotics, rendering these medications ineffective in treating infections.
  • Companion animals, pets like dogs and cats provide companionship and emotional support to humans.
  • Gut microbiome, the complex ecosystem of microorganisms residing in the gastrointestinal tract, including bacteria, viruses, and fungi.
  • Microbiome-resistance connection, the potential link between disruptions in the gut microbiome and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
  • Microbiome dysbiosis, a state of imbalance in the gut microbiome, characterized by shifts in the composition and diversity of bacterial communities.
  • Selection pressure, the environmental pressure that favors the survival and reproduction of organisms with certain traits, such as antibiotic resistance.
  • Horizontal gene transfer, the process by which genetic material is transferred between different bacterial species, allowing for the spread of resistance genes.
  • Probiotics, live microorganisms that confer health benefits when administered in adequate amounts.
  • Prebiotics, non-digestible dietary fibers that promote the growth of beneficial bacteria in the gut.
  • Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), a procedure involving the transfer of healthy gut bacteria from a donor to a recipient to restore a balanced microbiome.

References

1. Zaghini A. The use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine, a complex phenomenon: a narrative review. MDPI. 2023; 12(3):487.
2. Blate ME. Antimicrobial resistance in veterinary practices: a review. J Vet Med Health 2023; 7:172.
3. American Veterinary Medical Association. Antimicrobial use in veterinary practice. [Available from: https://www.avma.org/resources-tools/one-health/antimicrobial-use-and-antimicrobial-resistance/antimicrobial-use-veterinary-practice] (Accessed 27 October 2023).
4. Suchanek M, Bhandari N, Friedman JE. Antimicrobial resistance in the companion animal gut microbiome. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2019; 55(1):23–34; doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2018.08.002
5. Sommer MO, Dantas G. Enteric bacteria and the gut microbiota: friends and foes. Cell Host Microbe 2019; 25(2):149–60; doi:10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.001
6. Carabin H, Looten S. Antibiotics and the gut microbiota: a dangerous liaison. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018; 24(Suppl 1):S1–S7; doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.001
7. Guardabassi L, Pomba C. The use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine, a complex phenomenon: a narrative review. Vet Sci 2020; 7(3):487; doi: 10.3390/vetsci7030487
8. Guardabassi L, Moodley A, Ginn PE, Bentley SL, Layton R, Feeney MJ, et al. Dissemination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones among dogs and veterinary personnel in veterinary hospitals. Vet Microbiol 2006; 113(1-2):273–82; doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.01.022
9. Weese JS. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals. Clin Microbiol Infect 2010; 16(4):456–63; doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03189.x
10. Morris DO, Dohoo IR, Weese JS, Papadakis J, Gow SP. Risk factors for acquisition of fecal carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222(1):65–71; doi:10.2460/javma.2003.222.65
11. Weese JS. Fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in dogs: a growing concern. Can Vet J 2008; 49(1):49–53.
12. Podschun R, Ullmann U. Third generation cephalosporin-resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates: an emerging threat. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol 2013; 2(1):56–60; doi:10.18849/2319-3896/IJBCP/v2i1p56-60
13. Wyres KL, Holt KE. Klebsiella pneumoniae as a key trafficker of drug resistance genes from environmental to clinically important bacteria. Environ Microbiol 2018; 20(11):3954–74; doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14385
14. Pendleton JN, Gorman SP, Gilmore BF. Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013; 26(3):431–61; doi:10.1128/CMR.00003-13
15. American Veterinary Medical Association. Antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary medicine [Position paper].American Veterinary Medical Association, Schaumburg, IL, 2016.
16. Klein GC, Cunha BA. Outpatient antibiotic use in a children’s hospital: patterns of prescribing and potential for inappropriate use. Pediatrics 1995; 95(3):395–401.
17. Caneschi A, Bardhi A, Barbarossa A, Zaghini A. The use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine, a complex phenomenon: a narrative review. Antibiotics 2023 Mar 1; 12(3):487.
18. O’Neill J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations of the Independent Review on Antimicrobial Resistance.HM Government, London, UK, 2016.
19. American College of Veterinary Surgeons. Antimicrobial use guidelines for surgery in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013; 243:1463–8.
20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. One health zoonotic diseases. [Online]. Available via: https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/basics/index.html (Accessed 2023 Oct 26).
21. Manian F. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in animals. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003; 9(11):999–1010.
22. Weese J S, van Duijkeren E. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals. Clin Microbiol Infect 2010; 16(9):1222–27.
23. Morris D, Gillespie B, Bélanger D. Fluoroquinolone resistance in companion animals. Can Vet J 2006; 47(10):991–8.
24. Weese J S. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from dogs and cats: another look. Vet Microbiol 2011; 154(1-2):1–11.
25. Doi Y, Wacharotayankul L, Ishii Y, Ito H, Yokomizo Y, Matsushima A. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in dogs and cats: clinical and molecular characterization. Vet Microbiol 2003; 95(1-2):21–30.
26. Sykes M J, Livermore D M. New antibiotic resistance threats: what are the solutions? J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71(7):1613–8.
27. OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code Chapter 6.14: antimicrobial use in animals. OIE, Paris, France, 2023.
28. Weese JS. Antimicrobial stewardship in companion animal practice. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2011; 41(2):389–402; doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2011.01.004
29. Antimicrobial Resistance Threats in the United States 2023. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Chapter 2: One Health Solutions. CDC, Atlanta, GA, 2023
30. Sommer F, Nischwitz M, Richter A, Moesta DT, Riedel CU, Jahn D, et al. Gut microbiome assembly and its influence on host immunity. Nat Microbiol 2017; 2(1):17018; doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.241
31. Looft T, Allen HK, Stanton C, Manninen MH, Brüssow H, Wells JM, et al. Defining the core gut microbiome of healthy dogs and cats. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014; 80(15):4473–82; doi:10.1128/AEM.02197-14
32. Jernberg C, Löfmark S, Edlund C, Jansson JK. Long-term impacts of antibiotic exposure on the human intestinal microbiota. PLoS One. 2007; 2(11):e1003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001003
33. Sommer MO, Dantas G. Enterococcus faecium and vancomycin resistance in clinical settings. Curr Opin Microbiol 2011; 14(5):555–60; doi:10.1016/j.mib.2011.08.005
34. De Filippo C, Cavalieri D, Di Paola M, Ramazzotti M, Uccellatore A, Colombo M, et al. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota composition and activity in dogs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2014; 5:21; doi:10.1186/2049-1948-5-21
35. Hill RC, Whitley P, Bhandari S, Sutton AD, Aanensen DM, Viney I, et al. The role of gut microbiota in feline health and disease. J Feline Med Surg 2014; 16(1):1–11; doi:10.1177/1098612X13508902
36. Suchodolski JS. Importance of gut microbiota for the health and disease of dogs and cats. Anim Front 2016; 6:37–42; doi:10.1135/af.2015.0033
37. Hooper LV, Littman DR, Macpherson AJ. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science 2012; 336(6086):1213–18; doi:10.1126/science.1223493
38. Flint HJ, Duncan SH, Louis P, Flint JE. Links between diet, gut microbiota composition and gut health. Br J Nutr 2015; 113(S2):S1–S9; doi:10.1017/S0007114514002488
39. Redfern A, Suchodolski JS, Jergens AE. The role of gut microbiota in companion animal health and disease. Allied Academies [Online] 2022. Available via: https://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/the-role-of-gut-microbiota-in-companion-animal-health-and-disease-26559.html (Accessed October 27 2023)
40. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 2012; 486(7402):207–14.
41. Flint HJ, Duncan SH, Scott KP, Louis P. Microbial modulation of mammalian metabolism: mechanisms and potential for therapeutic intervention. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010; 8(7):411–20.
42. Sommer F, Bäckhed F. The gut microbiota—masters of host development and metabolic health. Nat Rev Microbiol 2013; 11(3):227–38.
43. Tortora G, Funke BR, Case CL. Microbiology: an introduction. 12th edition, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, NY, 2016.
44. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. Garrity G, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, editors. Phylum Firmicutes, Springer, New York, NY, 2001. Section 15.
45. Bybee SM, Rusch DB, Shields-Cutler K, Weese JS. Defining the canine gut microbiome: metagenomic analysis of dogs from eight locations in the United States. PLoS One 2013; 8(4):e61323; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061323
46. Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Sargent M, and Diaz L. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 2005; 308(5728):1635–8.
47. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota composition and fecal short-chain fatty acids in healthy subjects. Nat Commun 2020; 11(1):5165.
48. Staphylococcus aureus Virulence Factors. News-Medical 2023. Available via https://www.news-medical.net/health/Staphylococcus-Aureus-Virulence-Factors.aspx.
49. Schloss PD, Handelsman J. Metagenomics of the human gut microbiome: focusing on bacterial composition and diversity. Genome Biol 2005; 6:R72.
50. Tortora GJ, Funke BR, Case CL. Microbiology: an introduction. 12th edition, Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, CA, 2016.
51. Ryan FC, Ray RA. Sherris medical microbiology. 6th edition, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, NY, 2018.
52. Iglewski BM. Pseudomonas aeruginosa JN. Mol Microbiol. 2nd edition, ASM Press, 2009.
53. Podschun R, Ullmann U. Klebsiella pneumoniae as a nosocomial pathogen: epidemiology, taxonomy, and pathophysiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 2004; 17(2):288–305.
54. Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R. Revised estimates for the number of bacteria in the human gut. Microbiome 2016; 4:4; doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0144-6
55. Claesson MJ, Jeffery IB, Conde S, Power SE, O’Toole CJ, Quigley M, et al. Gut microbiota composition correlates with gut function and metabolic health in humans. Nature 2012; 488(7409):187–91; doi:10.1038/nature11360
56. Sender R, Receiver L. Actinobacteria: their role in the gut microbiome. In: companion animal microbiology. Springer, pp 123–45, 2023.
57. Parte AC. BacDive [Internet]. Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German collection of microorganisms and cell cultures, Berlin, Germany,2023. Available via https://bacdive.dsmz.de/ (Accessed 26 October 2023)
58. Tortora GJ, Funke BR, Case CL. Microbiology: an introduction. 13th edition. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, CA, 2019.
59. Ley RE, Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Knight R, Gordon JI. Worlds within worlds: evolution of the gut microbiome. Science. 2008; 320(5872):1647–51; doi:10.1126/science.1140014
60. Hooper LV, Midtvedt T, Gordon JI. How host-microbial interactions shape the nutrient balance in the mammalian gut. Science 2002; 291:802–5.
61. Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW, Knight R. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012; 10:832–45.
62. Hill MJ, Artis D. Intestinal bacteria and the regulation of immune and metabolic homeostasis. Annu Rev Immunol 2010; 28:223–62.
63. Thursby E, Juge J. Introduction to the human gut microbiota and its relevance in health and disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 31:1–12.
64. Sommer MO, Nookaew A, Faecal microbiota as a universal ecological factor in the pathogenesis of intestinal bacterial diseases. Int J Med Microbiol 2010; 290:207–16.
65. Lozupone C, Hamady M, Knight R. Strategies for analyzing the human gut microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2006; 30:686–701.
66. Rampart M, Bleich A, Klütsch K, Brand S. The contribution of gut microbiota to health and disease: mechanisms involved in oral and gastrointestinal pathology. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2018; 73:14–23.
67. Claassen E, Suchodolski JS. Fecal microbiota transplantation in dogs and cats: potential applications and future directions. J Anim Hosp Assoc 2018; 54:283–92.
68. Sommer F, Nuding S, Clement K, Bauer A, Below H, Bleich A, et al. Antibiotic treatment of fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: adverse events and long-term outcome. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 64(2):151–9; doi:10.1093/cid/ciw713
69. Ziętara N, Albrecht T, Sroka A, Gołębiewski M, Pyrcz T, Chmielarczyk A, et al. Gut microbiota composition in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2702; doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02702
70. Suchodolski JS. Impact of antimicrobial therapy on microbiome and antimicrobial resistance. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(48):10766–75; doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10766
71. Looft T, Allen HK, Stanton C, Manninen MH, Bruckner K, Gupta RK, et al. Bacteria that colonize the reindeer gut are highly diverse and dominated by cellulolytic and methanotrophic taxa. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2014; 88(2):309–20; doi:10.1111/1574-6941.12323
72. Konstantinidis T, Tsigalou C, Karvelas A, Tsigalou C, Karvelas A. Effects of antibiotics upon the gut microbiome: a review of the literature. Biomedicines 2020; 8(11):502; doi:10.3390/biomedicines8110502
73. Ramirez J, Guarner F, Bustos Fernandez L, Guarner F, Bustos Fernandez L. Antibiotics as major disruptors of gut microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020; 10:572912; doi:10.3894/fcimb.2020.572912
74. Yang L, Bajinka O, Jarju PO, Bajinka O, Jarju PO. The varying effects of antibiotics on gut microbiota. AMB Express 2021; 11(1):1274; doi:10.1186/s13568-021-01274-w
75. Suhr MJ, Finlay BB. The intricate dance of resident microbes and host immunity in the gut. Cell Host Microbe 2006; 10(4):321–8; doi:10.1016/j.chom.2006.10.001
76. Wright GD. Antibiotics and bacterial resistance: the battle continues. Respirology 2007; 12(4):482–93; doi:10.1111/j.1399-3003.2007.00793.x
77. Zentelis N, Skalidis G, Klinenberg R, Konstantinos CV. Probiotics and their influence on gastrointestinal infections and immune modulation. Benef Microbes 2014; 5(2):101–15; doi:10.3920/BM2013.0041
78. van Faassen M, Vieira-Silva C, Borges G, Clemente JC, Amaral J, Sousa JS, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation for antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2019; 53(4):306–13; doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001216
79. Strati F, Pujolassos M, Burrello C, Giuffrè MR, Lattanzi G, Caprioli F, et al. Antibiotic-associated dysbiosis affects the ability of the gut microbiota to control intestinal inflammation upon fecal microbiota transplantation in experimental colitis models. Microbiome 2021 Dec; 9:1–5; doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00991-x
80. Subramanian S, Zhu W, Inouye M. The paradox of antibiotic resistance. Trends Microbiol 2005; 13(8):371–8.
81. Andersson DI. Persistence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 2003; 1(10):559–66.
82. Hutkins RW. Microbial ecology of intestinal biofilms. Int J Microbiol 2007; 2007:7823145.
83. Song SJ, Lauber C, Costello EK, NISC Comparative Sequencing Initiative, Hamady M, Knight R. Microbial communities in dog fecal samples from different geographic regions. PLoS One 2013; 8(9):e74172; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074172
84. Sommer MO, Dantas G. Think outside the gut: antibiotic resistance and the human microbiome. Curr Opin Microbiol 2011; 14(4):551–7; doi:10.1016/j.mib.2011.07.001
85. Dethloff K, Schmitt E, Voßbeck I, Loy A. Antibiotics, immunity, and the gut microbiota. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 2012; 11(4):315–23; doi:10.2174/18715281212046100315. PMID: 22852255
86. Blaser MJ. Antibiotic overuse: consequences for the normal human microbiota. Ann Intern Med 2016; 164(7):494–501; doi:10.7326/M15-0706. PMID: 26908918.
87. Sommer MO, Dantas G. Antibiotics and the gut microbiome: the silent epidemic. Cell Host Microbe 2019; 26(4):569–78; doi:10.1016/j.chom.2019.10.011. PMID: 31670185.
88. Zaura A, Brandt LJ. Interactions between gut microbiota and probiotics in modulation of immune responses and epithelial barrier function. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 28(1):39–48; doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2013.10.003
89. Ochoa-Reparaz C, Mielcarz C, Wang Y, Kasper LH, Ochoa-Reparaz C, Mielcarz C, et al. Gut microbiome and its interaction with the immune system. Front Immunol 2019; 10:1574; doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01574
90. Wright GD. Evolution of antibiotic resistance by bacterial populations. Science 2005; 311(5767):1170–2; doi: 10.1126/science.1123556
91. Jernigan DB, Theriot CM, Bradley SF, Martin MK, Juergens RA, O’Brien TA. Clostridium difficile infection: a consensus statement by the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105(11):1416–49; doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.250
92. Blum HE, Schiffman H, Sandler RJ. Intestinal microbiota: functional aspects in humans. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2018; 42(5):691–708; doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv031
93. Guarner F, Garrido M, Sanchez-Plaza A, Westerbeek M, Suarez A, Redondo-Blasco J, et al. The gut microbiota in health and disease. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37(4):938–85. doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12035
94. Cani PD, Neyrinck AM, Fava F, Gemalmazov G, Knauf C, Bosscher D, et al. Gut microbiota modulation. Cell Metab 2008; 7(5):335–40. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2008.03.007
95. Suhr MJ, Coelho LP, Moreno AM, Steffens AM, Reif DM, Junqueira VM. Antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary medicine. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020; 9(1):12; doi:10.3390/antibiotics9010012
96. Looft T, Allen HK, Stanton CM. Antibiotics, microbiota, and the gut-brain axis. Neuropsychopharmacology 2019; 44(1):72–82; doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0043-0
97. Jernberg C, Löfmark S, Edlund C, Jansson JK. Long-term ecological impacts of antibiotic administration on the human intestinal microbiota. ISME J 2007; 1(1):56–66; doi:10.1038/ismej.2007.5
98. Suhr MJ. The intestinal microbiota, antimicrobial resistance, and the food chain. Curr Opin Microbiol 2018; 45:151–6; doi:10.1016/j.mib.2018.08.002. PMID: 30100385.
99. Mazmanian SK, Round JL, Kasper DL. Modulation of the immune response by gut microbiota. Cell 2005; 120(5):845–59; doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.001
100. Suau A, Bonnet R, Sutren M, Joly G, Doré J, Bourrier F, et al. Intestinal flora manipulation and its potential benefits for health. Lancet 2000; 356(9236):167–72; doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02421-6
101. Sekirov I, Russell SL, Antunes LC, Ward LR, Magalhaes JG, Finlay BB. Gut microbiota richness and composition promote beneficial immune regulation and contribute to anti-inflammatory responses. Cell Host Microbe 2008; 4(6):413–22; doi:10.1016/j.chom.2008.08.001
102. Jernberg JN, Löfmark S, Edlund C, Johansson L, Wrangsjö K, Falk P, et al. Long-term ecological impacts of antibiotic administration on the human intestinal microbiota. ISME J 2010; 4(9):1073–82; doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.84
103. Hrckova M, Benada O, Babak J, Fialova L, Rehak D. Gut microbiota composition and potential pathways for the modulation of human immunity by probiotic strains. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 2016; 61(3):191–7; doi:10.1007/s10293-016-0422-9
104. Marteau PR, Dore J, Leclerc M, Grimault A, Rambaud JC, Seksik P. Testing a probiotic strain for gastrointestinal tolerance and modulation of bifidobacteria in humans: a double-blind, controlled, multicenter trial. Dig Dis Sci 2001; 46(12):2435–40; doi:10.1093/gastro/46.12.2435.
105. Sommer MO, Nuding S, Bäckhed F, Färnkvist F, Bäckhed T. Antibiotic treatment alters intestinal bacterial communities in humans. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 76(15):4533–40; doi:10.1128/AEM.00223-10
106. Suchan M, Dewey TG, Stärk KD, Stärkel P. Linking the gut microbiome to antimicrobial resistance in animals. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:1829. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01829
107. Hutkins RW. Gut microbiota: regulation of antibiotic efficacy and resistance. J Clin Invest 2014; 124(10):4438–44; doi:10.1172/JCI76571
108. Delgado S, Guzman PR, García-López R, Suárez A, Latorre J, Moya A. Antibiotics and the gut microbiota: the hidden side of antibiotic therapy. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2018; 42(3):385–400; doi:10.1093/femsre/fux030
109. Zhang MS, Liang SZ, Zhang WG, Chang YJ, Lei Z, Li W, et al. Field ponding water exacerbates the dissemination of manure-derived antibiotic resistance genes from paddy soil to surrounding waterbodies. Front Microbiol 2023 Mar 16; 14:1135278.
110. Carvalho MJ, Sands K, Thomson K, Portal E, Mathias J, Milton R, et al. Antibiotic resistance genes in the gut microbiota of mothers and linked neonates with or without sepsis from low-and middle-income countries. Nat Microbiol 2022 Sep; 7(9):1337–47.
111. Bell ET, Suchodolski JS, Isaiah A, Fleeman LM, Cook AK, Steiner JM, et al. Faecal microbiota of cats with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus. PLoS One 2014 Oct 3; 9(10):e108729.
112. McBride KA. The role of animal research in evaluating the safety and efficacy of antimicrobial drugs. Vet Pathol 2007; 44(5):636–44.
113. Fricke-Wagner S. Design and analysis of animal studies in microbiome research. Gut Microbes 2017; 8(3):329–39.
114. Santhanam R, Groten K, Meldau DG, Baldwin IT. Analysis of plant-bacteria interactions in their native habitat: bacterial communities associated with wild tobacco are independent of endogenous jasmonic acid levels and developmental stages. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 11; 9(4):e94710.
115. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson SG, Altman DG, NC3Rs Reporting Guidelines Working Group. NC3Rs ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research: revised 2014. Lab Anim 2014; 48(12):573–9.
116. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 2012 Aug; 6(8):1621–4.
117. Suchodolski JS. The canine intestinal microbiome in health and disease. J Anim Sci 2012; 90(1):2537–45; doi:10.2527/jas.2012-2232
118. McArthur JC, Waglechner N, Bowler LD, Zinderman BV, Gibbons PS. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database (CARD): updates and future directions. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41(Database issue):D539–44; doi:10.1093/nar/gks1064
119. Sharon I, Garg N, Manor M, Elinav E. One-time metagenomic analysis sheds light on individualized microbial responses to dietary interventions. Cell Metab 2018; 28(5):950–60; doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.08.006
120. Khan AA, Beggs CB, Siddiqui MT, Khan MS, Khan MA. Fecal microbiota transplantation: a promising therapeutic tool for various diseases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 33(10):1719–28; doi:10.1111/jgh.14182
121. Bäckhed F, Ley RE, Sonnenburg JL, Peterson DA, Gordon JI. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science. 2005; 307(5717):1915–20; doi:10.1126/science.1104816
122. Suchanek M, Velge P, Peters F, Martinez A, Coque TM, Werner G. Antimicrobial use in veterinary medicine and its impact on human health. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1718; doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01718.
123. Sommer MO, Dantas G. Phage therapy in the age of antibiotic resistance. Cell Mol Life Sci 2018; 75(13):2373–82; doi:10.1007/s00018-018-06774-y.
124. David LA, Mater DD, Carignan C, McKinnon ML, Drouin-Chartier JP, Prévost D. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the gut microbiome. Gut 2014; 63(8):1192–200; doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305582.
125. Khanna G, Dewhurst-Newbold I, Zhou Z, McGinnity FJ, Gibson GR. The gut microbiome and its interaction with the immune system. Immunol Cell Biol 2016; 94(3):277–89; doi:10.1038/icb.2015.107.


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Mostafa Eissa|. Investigating the Gut Microbiome's Role in Antibiotic Resistance in Companion Animals. J Res Vet Sci. 2024; 2(4): 159-174. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240429060752


Web Style

Mostafa Eissa|. Investigating the Gut Microbiome's Role in Antibiotic Resistance in Companion Animals. https://www.wisdomgale.com/jrvs/?mno=199627 [Access: April 03, 2025]. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240429060752


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Mostafa Eissa|. Investigating the Gut Microbiome's Role in Antibiotic Resistance in Companion Animals. J Res Vet Sci. 2024; 2(4): 159-174. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240429060752



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Mostafa Eissa|. Investigating the Gut Microbiome's Role in Antibiotic Resistance in Companion Animals. J Res Vet Sci. (2024), [cited April 03, 2025]; 2(4): 159-174. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240429060752



Harvard Style

Mostafa Eissa| (2024) Investigating the Gut Microbiome's Role in Antibiotic Resistance in Companion Animals. J Res Vet Sci, 2 (4), 159-174. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240429060752



Turabian Style

Mostafa Eissa|. 2024. Investigating the Gut Microbiome's Role in Antibiotic Resistance in Companion Animals. Journal of Research in Veterinary Sciences, 2 (4), 159-174. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240429060752



Chicago Style

Mostafa Eissa|. "Investigating the Gut Microbiome's Role in Antibiotic Resistance in Companion Animals." Journal of Research in Veterinary Sciences 2 (2024), 159-174. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240429060752



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Mostafa Eissa|. "Investigating the Gut Microbiome's Role in Antibiotic Resistance in Companion Animals." Journal of Research in Veterinary Sciences 2.4 (2024), 159-174. Print. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240429060752



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Mostafa Eissa| (2024) Investigating the Gut Microbiome's Role in Antibiotic Resistance in Companion Animals. Journal of Research in Veterinary Sciences, 2 (4), 159-174. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240429060752