E-ISSN 2983-757X
 

Original Article
Online Published: 07 Oct 2024
 


Tersue, Adeke Joshua, Abdulsalam, Hassan, Gambo, Halima Idrisa, Lawan, Fatima Adamu, Adamu, Sani, Esievo, King Akpofure Nelson: Gross and histopathological changes in layers experimentally infected with Escherichia coli (APEC serotype O1K1)

ABSTRACT

Background:

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) induces colibacillosis, an acute systemic disease, resulting in substantial economic losses in the poultry sector.

Aim:

The study determined the gross and microscopic changes associated with Escherichia coli (E. coli) (APEC serotype O1K1) infection in layer chickens.

Methods:

A total of 10 layer chickens (20 weeks old) were acquired and assigned, at random, into two groups (infected and control) of 5 layers each. Each bird in the infected group was challenged with 0.5 ml of bacterial aliquot containing 109 colony-forming units of the bacteria, administered intra-tracheally. The birds from both groups were humanely sacrificed on the tenth day post-infection and subjected to post-mortem examination for gross and microscopic changes.

Results:

Gross lesions observed in the infected chickens included congested lungs, enlarged liver and kidneys, hyperaemic intestine, congested ovarian follicles, and yellowish fibrinous material in the infected group. While microscopic lesions observed were congested ovarian blood vessels, mononuclear cellular infiltration, and generalized necrosis of the liver, kidney, and heart.

Conclusion:

This study revealed various lesions of congested lungs, enlarged liver, hyperaemic intestine, enlarged kidneys, and congested ovarian follicles, yellowish fibrinous material, congested blood vessels of the oviduct that were typical of the natural infection and may be attributable to colisepticaemia.

Introduction

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) causes colibacillosis in chickens. APEC serotypes, as a group, are virulent for birds, which causes avian colibacillosis [1]. All types and age groups of birds are susceptible to the disease, ranging from chicks to adult layers, broilers, and breeders [2]. The organism can invade multiple organs resulting in systemic diseases such as coligranuloma, colisepticemia, omphalitis, synovitis, swollen head syndrome, airsacculitis, and cellulitis [3]. Colibacillosis causes considerable economic losses to the poultry industry due to high morbidity and mortality [4]. Escherichia coli (E. coli) is considered the natural inhabitant of avian gut microflora [5]. Several virulence factors, including adhesins, aerobactin, yersiniabactin, hemolysins, outer membrane protein A, lipopolysaccharide, K1-capsule, and heat stable toxin, have been reported in the propagation of various extra-intestinal diseases in avian species [6].
Risk factors for colibacillosis include poor biosecurity, overcrowding, inadequate ventilation, contaminated water and feed, and stressful conditions compromising the birds’ immune systems [7,8]. Clinical signs vary but often include diarrhea, dehydration, decreased appetite, respiratory distress, swollen wattles, and a drop in egg production [9]. Colibacillosis affects multiple organs in chickens, including the liver, intestines, and respiratory system. Pathological changes include inflammation, necrosis, and congestion in affected tissues [10].
Whereas colibacillosis is primarily an enteric disease in mammals, in poultry, it may be a localized or systemic disease, occurring mostly secondary to impairment of the host defense mechanisms [11]. The acute form of the disease is characterized by septicemia, which results in death. In contrast, its subacute form is accompanied by pericarditis, airsacculitis and perihepatitis, and reproductive tract infections like salpingitis and/or egg peritonitis, resulting in huge mortality [12]. Unlike other intestinal E. coli serotypes, APEC can be diagnosed by typical clinical signs, gross pathology, and microscopic lesions, as well as bacterial culture [13,14]; however, the general mechanism of APEC pathogenesis needs further explanations [15].
Although there are several researches on E. coli infections in different animal species, it will still be evaluated to revalidate existing literature and better understand the mechanism of the diseases. Therefore, this research was designed to explore tissue changes associated with experimental E. coli infection in layer chickens.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was sought from the Ethical Committee on Animal Use and Care of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (ABUECAUC), with Approval number ABUECAUC/2017/026.

Location of experimental study

This study was carried out in the Department of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State, which is located within the Northern Guinea Savannah Zone of Nigeria, between latitude 70 and 110N, and longitude 70 and 440E. The average rainfall of this zone ranges from 1,000 to 1,250 mm, and the average temperature ranges from 190C to 330C [16].

Experimental animals and design

A total of 10 layer (20 weeks old) chickens that were specifically raised for research purposes and vaccinated against endemic vaccinable diseases in the area, except E. coli infections, were purchased from a reputable farm in Kaduna State, Nigeria. The birds were housed and managed intensively in the poultry research pens of the Department. Before the arrival of the birds, the pens were thoroughly washed with detergent and sprayed with formalin at a concentration of 4 ml/l of water. Throughout the experiment, the birds were fed standard commercial layer mash (Hybrid Feeds®), and water was provided to the birds’ ad libitum.

The bacterial organism

Escherichia coli used in this experiment, APEC serotype O1K1, was obtained from the bacteria bank of the National Veterinary Research Institute, Vom, Plateau State, Nigeria.

Grouping and inoculation of birds with E. coli

The birds were kept for 4 weeks to acclimatize to the new environment and other handling conditions, after which they were divided randomly into two groups (infected and control) of 5 layers each. The control birds were housed in a pen far away from the pen in which the birds of the infected group were housed. The bacteria from a previously prepared slant were reactivated by sub-culturing on eosin and methylene blue. The resulting colonies were then examined for their characteristic features, color, and morphology and tested for gram stain reaction. On the day of infection (Day 0), the bacterial inoculum was prepared using McFarland standards, which were prepared by adding barium chloride to sulphuric acid to obtain a barium precipitate of different turbidity standards. These were used to estimate the number of bacteria in a liquid suspension [17]. In this test, the turbidity of the suspension of bacteria was compared with a turbidity of the appropriate standard. Each of the birds in the infected group was then challenged by inoculating each of the birds in the infected group with 0.5 ml of bacterial aliquot containing 109 colony-forming units of the bacteria intratracheally [10]. After inoculation, the bacteria were recovered from infected birds by following conventional culture, isolation, and identification of bacteria by standard procedures [18].

Clinical observations

From day 0 of infection and throughout the experimental period, birds in the infected group were closely monitored for clinical signs of colibacillosis and recorded accordingly.

Postmortem and histopathological examination

Four birds each from both groups (infected and control) were sacrificed at 10 days post-infection and subjected to post-mortem examination; gross lesions observed were recorded accordingly. All sanitary measures in preventing contamination of the carcass were ensured. The liver, ovarian follicles, kidney, and heart specimens were collected into bottles containing 10% neutral buffered formalin and subsequently processed, using standard techniques, for histopathological examination according to Bancroft and Gamble [19]. Processed slides were examined using a light microscope at different magnifications. Gross lesions were snapped using a digital camera accordingly.

Results

Gross findings

The gross lesions observed in the E. coli-infected layers were congested lungs (Fig. 1), enlarged liver (Fig. 2), hyperaemic intestine (Fig. 3), enlarged kidney (Fig. 4), and congested ovarian follicles (arrowhead), yellowish fibrinous material (short arrow) congested blood vessels of the oviduct (Fig. 5).
Figure 1.
Photograph showing congested lungs (arrow) from a layer in E. coli-infected group on day 10 pi.
ure
C:UsersDr JoshuaDesktopSD CardIMG_20170718_121211.jpg
Figure 2.
Photograph showing enlarged liver (arrow in A) from E. coli-infected layer and liver from the control group (arrowhead) on day 10 pi.
Figure 3.
Photograph of intestine showing hyperemia (A) and thickened mucosal membrane from E. coli-infected layer on day 10 pi.
Figure 4.
Photograph showing congested lungs (short arrow) and enlarged kidney (arrow head) from E. coli-infected layer on day 10 pi.
Figure 5.
Photograph showing congested ovarian follicles (arrowhead), yellowish fibrinous material (short arrow), and congested blood vessels of the oviduct (long arrow) in the E. coli-infected layer on day 10 pi.

Histopathology of tissues harvested from E. coli-infected group of layers

The ovarian follicle showed congestion of ovarian blood vessels (Fig. 6). Heart showed necrosis of cardiac myocytes, congested blood vessels, and mononuclear cellular infiltration (Fig. 7). The kidney showed diffused necrosis of renal tubular epithelium, aggregation of mononuclear cells, and congested blood vessels (Fig. 8). The liver showed diffused necrosis of hepatocytes, perivascular aggregation of mononuclear cells, and congestion of the central vein (Fig. 9).
Figure 6.
Photomicrograph of ovary section from E. coli-infected chicken showing (a) congestion of ovarian blood vessel on day 10 pi. H&E X 250
Figure 7.
Photomicrograph of section of heart from E. coli-infected chicken showing congestion (a), mononuclear cellular infiltration (b), necrosis of the cardiac myocytes (c) on day 10 pi. H&E X 250.
Figure 8.
Photomicrograph of section of kidney from E. coli-infected chicken showing diffused necrosis of renal tubular epithelium (a), aggregation of mononuclear cells (b), congested blood vessels (c) on day 10 pi. (H&E × 250).
Figure 9.
Photomicrograph of liver section from E. coli-infected chicken showing diffuse necrosis of hepatocytes (a), perivascular aggregation of mononuclear cells (b), congestion of central vein (c) on day 10 pi. H&E × 400.

Discussion

In the present study, the grossly observed congestion of the serosal blood vessels of the oviduct and fibrin deposition was previously reported following E. coli infection of layer birds [20]. This is indicative of acute condition [1]. It was also reported that lesions associated with ascending E. coli infection from the cloaca consequent of salpingitis [21] could be responsible for egg peritonitis frequently encountered in layer birds [22]. Enlarged liver (hepatomegaly) with necrotic foci was also reported in the liver of broilers and layers in the natural colibacillosis outbreak in Eastern Sudan [23]. In line with our results, Sharif et al. [24], and Sonwane et al. [25] also reported degenerative changes in liver and heart sections of E. coli-infected birds. The gross lesion observed in the lungs is similar to Gangane et al. [26] and Kumari et al. [27] which correspond to congestion, edema, and pneumonic foci. Also, Shah et al. [28] in an experimental study on colibacillosis reported congestion and pneumonic lesions in the lungs. Similarly, congested and hemorrhagic kidneys have been reported [6], which might be due to vascular damage caused by E. coli endotoxin [29].
Histopathological evaluation showed damaged liver, kidney, as well as lungs. Many authors have documented similar histological alterations in the kidney, liver, and heart in E. coli-infected broilers [3,30,31,25]. However, degenerative intestinal changes can be attributed to enterotoxin released by E. coli [3]. The lesions of mycardial congestion, mononuclear cellular infiltration, necrosis of the cardiac myocytes observed is in comformity with Lateif et al. [2]. Similarly, chick-lethal toxin and immunosuppression induced by E. coli infection may cause lymphopenia and necrotic foci in immune organs [32,27]. The observed inflammatory and necrotic lesions in the liver of affected birds might be due to E. coli endotoxin and vascular injury [20]. Similar focal necrosis and cellular infiltration were reported in the liver of birds that came down with colibacillosis [29]. Likewise, congested central veins and sinusoids with cellular infiltration around the portal area were reported by El-Ghany and Madian [33] in the liver of broiler chickens infected with E. coli. Similarly, Dutta et al. [34] reported hemorrhage and degenerative tubular changes in the kidneys of E. coli-infected pigeons. This is because most internal organs are affected when E. coli gets to the vascular system [35] as seen in this study.

Conclusion

This study revealed various lesions of congested lungs, enlarged liver, hyperaemic intestine, enlarged kidney, and congested ovarian follicles, yellowish fibrinous material, congested blood vessels of the oviduct that are indicative of Colibacillosis. The observed changes following experimental E. coli infection were typical of the natural infection and may be attributable to colisepticaemia. Diagnoses based on gross examination can be made accurately on up to 90% of samples. This is the importance of gross description. However, for macroscopic pathology to be of help in establishing a diagnosis; knowledge, precision, and accuracy in gross description are required.

Acknowledgment

The authors are profoundly grateful to all the technical staff of the veterinary clinical pathology and microbiology laboratory of Ahmadu Bello University Zaria.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

1. Miglani S. APEC report. Aust Endod J 2023; 49:466-67.
2. Lateif BM, Ahmed JA, Najem HA. Genotypic characterization of Escherichia coli isolated from infected chicken in Basrah, Iraq. Online J Anim Feed Res 2024; 14(1):29–39.
3. Guabiraba R, Schouler C. Avian colibacillosis: still many black holes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2015; 362(15):fnv118.
4. Koutsianos D, Athanasiou L, Mossialos D, Koutoulis K. Colibacillosis in poultry: a disease overview and the new perspectives for its control and prevention. J Hellenic Vet Med Soc 2021; 71(4):2425–36.
5. Sarowska J, Futoma-Koloch B, Jama-Kmiecik A, Frejmadrzak M, Ksiazczyk M, Bugla-Ploskonska G, et al. Virulence factors, prevalence and potential transmission of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from different sources: recent reports. Gut Pathog 2019; 11(1):10.
6. Usman S, Anjum A, Usman M, Imran MS, Ali M, Moustafa M, et al. Antibiotic resistance pattern and pathological features of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli O78:K80 in chickens. Braz J Biol 2024; 84:e257179.
7. Swelum AA, Elbestawy AR, El-Saadony MT, Hussein EOS, Alhotan R, Suliman GM, et al. Ways to minimize bacterial infections, with special reference to Escherichia coli, to cope with the firstweek mortality in chicks: an updated overview. Poult Sci 2021; 100(5):101039.
8. Abdel-Rahman MAA, Hamed EA, Abdelaty MF, Sorour HK, Badr H, Hassan WM, et al. Distribution pattern of antibiotic resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolated from colibacillosis cases in broiler farms of Egypt. Vet World 2023; 16(1):1–11.
9. Gedeno K, Hailegebreal G, Tanga BM, Sulayeman M, Sori T. Epidemiological investigations of Salmonella and Escherichia coli associated morbidity and mortality in layer chickens in Hawassa city, Southern Ethiopia. Heliyon 2022; 8(12):e12302.
10. Kromann S, Olsen RH, Bojesen AM, Jensen HE, Thøfner I. Development of an aerogenous Escherichia coli infection model in adult broiler breeders. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1):19556.
11. Saif YM. Disease of poultry. 11th edition, Black Well Publisher, Hoboken, NJ, p 631, 2003.
12. Lawal JR, Ndahi JJ, Lawan FA, John B, Ibrahim UI, Sarki MJ, et al. Study of avian colibacillosis and antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from chickens (Gallus domesticus) in Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria. AJBAR 2024; 3(3):82–100.
13. Fancher CA, Zhang L, Kiess AS, Adhikari PA, Dinh TTN, Sukumaran AT. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and Clostridium perfringens: challenges in no antibiotics ever broiler production and potential solutions. Microorganisms 2020; 8(10):1533.
14. Kakooza S, Muwonge A, Nabatta E, Eneku W, Ndoboli D, Wampande E, et al. A retrospective analysis of antimicrobial resistance in pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. isolates from poultry in Uganda. Int J Vet Sci Med 2021; 9(1):11–21.
15. Matin MA, Islam MA, Khatun MM. Prevalence of colibacillosis in chickens in greater Mymensingh district of Bangladesh. Vet World 2017; 10(1):29–33.
16. Sawa BA, Buhari B. Temperature variability and outbreak of meningitis and measles in Zaria. Res J Applied Sci Eng Tech 2011; 3(5):399–402.
17. McFarland J. Nephelometer: an instrument for estimating the number of bacteria in sus-Med. Wet 1907; 50(6):261–2.
18. Cheesbrough M. District Laboratory practice in tropical countries. 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2010 (5th Printing).
19. Bancroft JD, Gamble M. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 5th edition, Churchill Livingstone Publication, Edinburgh, UK, pp 593–620, 2002.
20. Abalaka SE, Sani NA, Idoko IS, Tenuche OZ, Oyelowo FO, Ejeh SA, et al. Pathological changes associated with an outbreak of colibacillosis in a commercial broiler flock. Sokoto J Vet Sci 2017; 15(3):95–102.
21. Ozaki H, Murase T. Multiple routes of entry for Escherichia coli causing colibacillosis in commercial layer chickens. JVMS 2009; 71(12):1685–9.
22. Kromann K, Jensen HE. In vivo models of Escherichia coli infection in poultry. Acta Vet Scand 2022; 64(33):1-16.
23. Omer MM, Abusalab SM, Gumaa MM, Mulla SA, Omer EA, Jeddah IE, et al. Outbreak of colibacillosis among broiler and layer flocks in intensive and semi-intensive poultry farms in Kassala state, eastern Sudan. Asian J Poul Sci 2010; 4(4):173–81.
24. Sharif H, Javed MT, Ghafoor H, Younis M, Khan SU, Rehman A, et al. Association of pathogenicity genes (cvaC, iss, iutA, Stx1A, Stx2A and Vat) of E. coli with gross and histopathological lesions of colibacillosis in broilers. Biomed Lett 2018; 4(2):40–6.
25. Sonwane SR, Ingole RS, Hedau MS, Hajare SW, Ingawale MV. The ameliorative effect of Andrographis paniculata on E. coli-induced pathology in broilers. Vet Arh 2019; 89(4):545–57.
26. Gangane GR, Kulkarni GB, Yeotikar PV. Studies on experimental colibacillosis in chicks. IVJ 2006; 83:118–9.
27. Kumari M, Gupta RP, Sharma R. Biochemical and immunological response of Ocimum sanctum in chickens experimentally infected with Escherichia coli. Indian J Vet Pathol 2014; 38(2):98–102.
28. Shah SA, Mir MS, Wani BM, Kamil SA, Goswami P, Amin U, et al. Pathological studies on avian pathogenic Escherichia coli infection in broilers. Pharma Innov J 2019; 8(7):68–73.
29. Srinivasan P, Balasubramaniam GA, Murthy TR, Balachandran P. Pathomorphological studies of polyserositis in commercial caged layer chicken. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2014; 7(Suppl 1):S313–20.
30. Sharma V, Jakhar KK, Nehra V, Kumar S. Biochemical studies in experimentally Escherichia coli infected broiler chicken supplemented with neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf extract. Vet World 2015; 8(11):1340–5.
31. Mousa MD, Ali HB. Impact of boron and nano-boron on the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio and histopathological changes of liver and kidney in broiler chickens infected with Escherichia coli. Magallat al-Basrat Li-l-Abhat al-Baytariyyat 2018; 17(3):290–306.
32. Wu QJ, Zhou YM, Wu YN, Zhang LL, Wang T. The effects of natural and modified clinoptilolite on intestinal barrier function and immune response to LPS in broiler chickens. Vet Immunol Immunopath 2013; 153(1-2):70–6.
33. El-Ghany WAA, Madian K. Control of experimental colisepticaemia in broiler chickens using sarafloxacin. Life Sci J 2011; 8(3):318–28.
34. Dutta P, Borah MK, Sarmah R, Gangil R. Isolation, histopathology and antibiogram of Escherichia coli from pigeons (Columba livia). Vet World 2013; 6(2):91–4.
35. Kabir SML. Avian colibacillosis and salmonellosis: a closer look at epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, control, and public health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010; 7(1):89–114.


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Adeke, Tarsue J, Abdulsalam H, Gambo HI, Lawan FA, Adamu S, Esievo KAN. Gross and Histopathological Changes in Layers Experimentally Infected with Escherichia coli (APEC serotype O1KI). J Res Vet Sci. 2024; 4(2): 41-46. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240915103232


Web Style

Adeke, Tarsue J, Abdulsalam H, Gambo HI, Lawan FA, Adamu S, Esievo KAN. Gross and Histopathological Changes in Layers Experimentally Infected with Escherichia coli (APEC serotype O1KI). https://www.wisdomgale.com/jrvs/?mno=302657711 [Access: April 03, 2025]. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240915103232


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Adeke, Tarsue J, Abdulsalam H, Gambo HI, Lawan FA, Adamu S, Esievo KAN. Gross and Histopathological Changes in Layers Experimentally Infected with Escherichia coli (APEC serotype O1KI). J Res Vet Sci. 2024; 4(2): 41-46. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240915103232



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Adeke, Tarsue J, Abdulsalam H, Gambo HI, Lawan FA, Adamu S, Esievo KAN. Gross and Histopathological Changes in Layers Experimentally Infected with Escherichia coli (APEC serotype O1KI). J Res Vet Sci. (2024), [cited April 03, 2025]; 4(2): 41-46. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240915103232



Harvard Style

Adeke, Tarsue, . J., Abdulsalam, . H., Gambo, . H. I., Lawan, . F. A., Adamu, . S. & Esievo, . K. A. N. (2024) Gross and Histopathological Changes in Layers Experimentally Infected with Escherichia coli (APEC serotype O1KI). J Res Vet Sci, 4 (2), 41-46. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240915103232



Turabian Style

Adeke, Joshua Tarsue, Hassan Abdulsalam, Halima Idrisa Gambo, Fatima Adamu Lawan, Sani Adamu, and King Akpofure Nelson Esievo. 2024. Gross and Histopathological Changes in Layers Experimentally Infected with Escherichia coli (APEC serotype O1KI). Journal of Research in Veterinary Sciences, 4 (2), 41-46. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240915103232



Chicago Style

Adeke, Joshua Tarsue, Hassan Abdulsalam, Halima Idrisa Gambo, Fatima Adamu Lawan, Sani Adamu, and King Akpofure Nelson Esievo. "Gross and Histopathological Changes in Layers Experimentally Infected with Escherichia coli (APEC serotype O1KI)." Journal of Research in Veterinary Sciences 4 (2024), 41-46. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240915103232



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Adeke, Joshua Tarsue, Hassan Abdulsalam, Halima Idrisa Gambo, Fatima Adamu Lawan, Sani Adamu, and King Akpofure Nelson Esievo. "Gross and Histopathological Changes in Layers Experimentally Infected with Escherichia coli (APEC serotype O1KI)." Journal of Research in Veterinary Sciences 4.2 (2024), 41-46. Print. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240915103232



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Adeke, Tarsue, . J., Abdulsalam, . H., Gambo, . H. I., Lawan, . F. A., Adamu, . S. & Esievo, . K. A. N. (2024) Gross and Histopathological Changes in Layers Experimentally Infected with Escherichia coli (APEC serotype O1KI). Journal of Research in Veterinary Sciences, 4 (2), 41-46. doi:10.5455/JRVS.20240915103232